अयोध्यायां शोकविलापः · Lamentation in Ayodhya after Daśaratha’s death
Spoken by KausalyaPlaces named: Videha, vanaAnticipation of forest-exile (vana-vāsa)
विदेहराजस्य सुता तथा सीता तपस्विनी ।
दुःखस्यानुचिता दुःखं वने पर्युद्विजिष्यति ॥९॥
videharājasya sutā tathā sītā tapasvinī |
duḥkhasyānucitā duḥkhaṁ vane paryudvijiṣyati ||9||
विदेह के राजा की बेटी सीता भी वैसे ही दुख में पड़ेगी। वो तपस्वी है, ऐसे दुख के लायक नहीं। वन में रहते हुए वो बहुत दुखी होगी और हिल जाएगी।
In the same way Sita, daughter of the king of Videha, who does not deserve hardships will be in deep agony.
Dharma may demand endurance that compassion finds hard to accept; foreseeing suffering is part of responsible counsel.
Contemplation on Sītā’s tapas and the cultivation of titikṣā; empathy without attachment to comfort.
Duḥkha as a transient vṛtti of antaḥkaraṇa; the contrast between deha-sukha and dharma-niṣṭhā foregrounds vairāgya.
Kṣānti/titikṣā as a mark of inner steadiness (echoing the Upaniṣadic valorization of self-mastery over external comfort).
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.27–2.30 (Sītā’s insistence on accompanying Rāma to the forest); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.33 (Sītā’s forest-readiness contrasted with courtly delicacy)
Dharmaśāstra/Arthaśāstra motif: the hardship of exile as a test of dharma
Ayodhyākāṇḍa context: Daśaratha’s death and the impending departure intensify concern for Sītā
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Grieving
Mandra-gāndhāra-prāya, vilambita
Dharma includes compassion for those who suffer undeservedly; the verse spotlights the moral tragedy of innocent persons bearing the weight of others’ adharma.
Kauśalyā imagines Sītā’s distress as she accompanies Rāma into forest exile.
Sītā’s tapas (austere strength) is acknowledged, while the verse stresses her gentleness and the injustice of her suffering.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.