Sukta 73
यो वः॒ शुष्मो॒ हृद॑येष्व॒न्तराकू॑ति॒र्या वो॒ मन॑सि॒ प्रवि॑ष्टा । तान्त्सी॑वयामि ह॒विषा॑ घृ॒तेन॒ मयि॑ सजाता र॒मति॑र्वो अस्तु
yó vaḥ śúṣmo hṛ́dayeṣv antár ākū́tir yā́ vo mánasi práviṣṭā | tā́n tsī́vayāmi havíṣā ghṛténa máyi sa-jātā rámatir vo astu ||
What ardour of yours is within your hearts, what purpose hath entered into your mind—those do I stitch together with oblation, with ghee: in me, O clansmen, let your delight and concord be.
तुम्हारे दिल में जो बात है, तुम्हारे मन में जो सोच है, मैं उसे घी से जोड़ देता हूँ। सब मिलकर खुश रहो। मेरे साथ मिलकर खुश रहो।
The speaker addresses the group’s inner ardor (śuṣma) and intention (ākūti) lodged in heart and mind, and ritually “stitches” these impulses into unity using oblation and ghee, asking that the group’s shared delight (ramati) rest in the speaker/ritual center.
Heated affect and divergent agendas are acknowledged without suppression; they are gathered, aligned, and ‘sutured’ into a single cooperative will. The ‘I’ functions as a stabilizing axis (leader, household head, ritual locus) that metabolizes intensity into concord.
Community coherence is not achieved by denial of strong energies but by skillfully binding them to a shared purpose through a sanctified center—attention, speech, and offering transform raw drive into mutual joy.
To bind divergent intentions into a single harmonious disposition; to convert heated ‘śuṣma’ into shared ‘ramati’.
यः । वः । शुष्मः । हृदयेषु । अन्तर् । आकूतिः । या । वः । मनसि । प्रविष्टा । तान् । सीवयामि । हविषा । घृतेन । मयि । स-जाताः । रमतिः । वः । अस्तु ।
Sāyaṇa emphasizes the technical verb ‘sīvayāmi’ as a deliberate bandhana-metaphor: the priest ‘sews’ scattered intentions into unity by means of havis and ghṛta, substances that ‘join’ and ‘smooth.’ ‘Mayi’ is interpreted either as the officiant (mantra-holder) or the leader designated in 6.73.1, making unity focalized rather than diffuse.
Atharvanic
Sāṃmanasya (social concord) charms; domestic pacification through vāc and offering
Embodies the Atharvan mode of ‘healing the social body’: speech and oblation operate as sutures that close ruptures in group intention.
Sāṃmanasya / Ākūti (operative power of concord/intention)
Orders multiplicity into coherent collective functioning; aligns inner resolve (ākūti) with communal stability.
Heals psychosomatic agitation arising from conflict; cools ‘social inflammation’ by converting śuṣma into ramati.
Protects the household/clan from schism, defection, and factional speech.
4 pādas × ~8 syllables (Atharvanic flexibility in resolution/caesura)
Slightly mantra-prose feel in the first hemistich; cadence prioritizes performative verbs (sīvayāmi) over strict metrical regularity.
Even, binding rhythm suited to ‘gathering’ and ‘joining’ actions.
Creates a steady compressive unity—good for group recitation where tempo synchronizes breath and attention.
Prepare ghṛta and a simple havis portion.
While reciting the mantra, make a small offering into fire (or touch ghṛta to a ladle as substitute in domestic setting).
Perform a symbolic ‘stitching’: draw a thread/cord across the assembled persons or tie a single cord that all touch, synchronizing with ‘sīvayāmi’.
End by having the group touch the leader/officiant (or a central post/seat) to enact ‘mayi … astu’ (unity located ‘in me/in this center’).
Kauśika Sūtra: sāmmanasya-karman with offerings of ghṛta (indexed to AV 6.73.2 in mantra lists).
Atharvan priest as binder (bandhaka), coordinating offering, cord-gesture, and speech to effect psychological and social integration.
Recited over a shared offering of ghee; performed when family factions arise or before collective decisions/feasts.
At dusk/evening assembly or before communal meal/rite; also before travel/negotiation.
Householder or purohita leads; group may respond with refrain-like assent.
Likely within Kauśika’s sāṃmanasya/saṃdhi-karman clusters for concord-making (exact sūtra number varies by edition).
Used as a ‘family reconciliation’ recitation with a small lamp and ghee offering (symbolic fire).
havis (oblation); ghṛta (ghee)
havis implies offering into fire; ghṛta commonly poured into āhavanīya/household fire
Ghee is the cohesive, clarifying medium that ‘seals seams’; havis is the communal cost that makes unity real—shared giving binds shared willing.
Social/psychic distress (kalahā—quarrel), agitation, factional anger (a ‘heat’ model via śuṣma)
hṛdaya (heart)
Verbal binding + offering symbolism; reframes intensity as communal fuel; produces parasympathetic settling through synchronized ritual.
Pitta-like ‘heat’ pacified by ghṛta (classically śamana for pitta/vāta agitation); manas-hṛdaya calming (sattvavajaya analogue).
Conflict de-escalation, group cohesion practice, stress reduction; ‘repair’ of relational rupture.
Kin-group/household assembly
Bind divergent intentions into one harmonious disposition; secure concord and shared delight centered on the ritual leader/household axis.
Bandhana-by-metaphor (‘stitching’); oblation-assisted speech-act; centripetal anchoring (‘in me’).
Schism, rumor, factional speech, impulsive defection
Household stability; cooperative labor; shared resources
Integration of heart-heat (śuṣma) into unified intention (ākūti) and benevolent speech.
Anāhata (heart)
Slow equal breathing (sama-vṛtti) during the ‘stitching’ phrase; brief pause after sīvayāmi.
Golden ghee-light sewing a luminous seam across fragmented thoughts, drawing them into one warm center.
Sattvic coherence; collective attunement.
Chant with attention in the heart; on ‘sīvayāmi’ feel inner threads knot into one resolve; end resting in quiet goodwill toward each person named mentally.
Recitation in Atharvanic udātta/anudātta/svarita as per Śaunakīya tradition; keep udātta peaks on key nouns/verbs (śuṣma, ākūti, sīvayāmi).
Slight lift on śuṣmó / ākūtí; firm articulation on sī-vayā-mi; soften into mayi sajātāḥ.
Warm, unifying, non-aggressive; end phrase with settling cadence.
Best chanted with a small ghee offering or lamp; the performative verb ‘sīvayāmi’ is the ritual ‘knot’—do not rush it.
11 times
Offer a small ghee lamp while chanting; Follow with a structured listening round (each speaks without interruption); Share food (commensality) to seal concord
Family conflict, team discord, community meeting with competing agendas.
Before reconciliation talks; before shared meals/rituals; when group energy feels ‘hot’ and scattered.
Reduced reactivity, increased willingness to align, restored sense of shared belonging.
Not a substitute for practical conflict resolution; avoid using ‘in me’ language manipulatively—frame it as ‘in this shared center/ritual space’.
Ghṛta is not botanical but a paradigmatic cohesive medium; its viscosity and ritual purity make it an enacted metaphor for social cohesion. The mantra’s ‘sewing’ is materially mirrored by offering with ghṛta and (often) cord-operations, turning metaphor into rite.
Unity is engineered by a specialist who claims capacity to manipulate internal states (‘entered into your mind’). The ‘mayi’ locus suggests authority concentrated in priest or leader; concord is produced through sanctioned centralization.
The psychological vocabulary (ākūti, manas, hṛd) is shared with RV, but the explicit technicization—‘I sew together’—is more Atharvanic, aligning speech with craft-operations (textile imagery) as ritual technology.
Gopatha’s logic of bandhana (binding) supports such mantras: properly offered havis and correctly uttered brahman ‘fasten’ desired states. The verse exemplifies the Atharvanic claim that inner dispositions are ritually addressable.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.