Atharva Veda 2.12.6: Kanda 2, Anuvaka 2, Sukta 12, Mantra 6
Sukta 12
अती॑व॒ यो म॑रुतो॒ मन्य॑ते नो॒ ब्रह्म॑ वा॒ यो निन्दि॑षत् क्रि॒यमा॑णम्। तपूं॑षि॒ तस्मै॑ वृजि॒नानि॑ सन्तु ब्रह्म॒द्विषं॒ द्यौर॑भि॒संत॑पाति
atī́va yó maruto mányate no bráhma vā yó níndiṣat kriyámāṇam | tapū́ṃṣi tásmai vṛjinā́ni santu brahmadvíṣaṃ dyáur abhísantapāti ||
Whoso, O Maruts, beyond all measure deemeth ill of us, or whoso revileth the holy spell while it is being wrought,—for him let burnings and misfortunes be: Heaven on the hater of the Brahman shall scorch down fiercely.
मरुत भगवान, जो भी हमारे बारे में बुरी बात सोचता है, या जो हमारी पूजा के दौरान गाली देता है, उसके लिए बड़ी मुसीबत होनी चाहिए। आग उसपे गिरे, बुरा वक्त आए। जो ब्राह्मण की पूजा से नफरत करता है, आकाश उसपे अपनी गर्मी बरसाए।
The meaning
What it says
Whoever, O Maruts, thinks too ill of us, or reviles the brahman (spell) while it is being performed—let burnings and misfortunes be his. Heaven itself scorches the hater of brahman.
The inner meaning
The rite is a protected container. Malign judgment and ridicule during ritual are treated as active sabotage that damages the subtle work. ‘Heat’ (tapas/santāpa) symbolizes the self-consuming consequence of attacking sacred speech: the offender is burned by the very order they violate.
The truth in it
Contempt for truth-bearing speech harms both community and the contemptor. Speech that protects life (brahman/vāc) demands reverence; sabotage rebounds as self-inflicted suffering.
What it is for
- Kind of hymn
- Abhicarika (Protective/Counter-sorcery; punitive imprecation against ritual obstruction)
Its aim
To repel and punish those who malign or obstruct an ongoing Atharvanic rite; to turn hostile thought and speech back upon the offender as burning affliction and misfortune.
Word by Word
Pada patha
अतीव । यः । मरुतः । मन्यते । नः । ब्रह्म । वा । यः । निन्दिषत् । क्रियमाणम् । तपूंषि । तस्मै । वृजिनानि । सन्तु । ब्रह्म-द्विषम् । द्यौः । अभि-संतपाति ।
- अतीव
- excessively, too muchexcessively, beyond measure (intensifier of hostile intent)Indeclinableअव्यय (तुलनार्थ/अतिशयार्थ)Role विशेषण-भावे (क्रियाविशेषण)Root अति-इव (उपसर्ग+निपात) / अतीव (अव्यय)
- यः
- who (he who)who (any such person, indefinite adversary)Pronounपुंलिङ्गः, प्रथमा, एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot यद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
- मरुतः
- the MarutsO Maruts (storm-gods invoked as enforcers and witnesses)Nounपुंलिङ्गः, द्वितीया, बहुवचनम्Role KarmaRoot मरुत् (प्रातिपदिक)
- मन्यते
- thinks, supposesthinks, deems, plots (harbours a hostile opinion/plan)Verbलट् (वर्तमान), आत्मनेपदम्, प्रथमपुरुषः, एकवचनम्Role क्रियाRoot √मन् (मन्यते) (धातु)
- नः
- of us / to usagainst us / of us (the ritual community as target)Pronounषष्ठी (सम्बन्धे) / चतुर्थी (सम्प्रदान) बहुवचनस्य एन्क्लिटिक-रूपम्; अत्र ‘our/us’Role Sampradāna (लाभ/हानि-संबन्धे) / सम्बन्धRoot अस्मद् (सर्वनाम)
- ब्रह्म
- sacred utterance, prayer; brahmansacred formulation, Atharvanic spell-power; also the priestly utterance as weaponNounनपुंसकलिङ्गः, प्रथमा/द्वितीया, एकवचनम् (अत्र कर्मरूपे)Role KarmaRoot ब्रह्मन् (प्रातिपदिक)
- वा
- orIndeclinableविकल्पार्थक-अव्ययRole समुच्चय/विकल्पRoot वा (निपात)
- यः
- whoPronounपुंलिङ्गः, प्रथमा, एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot यद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
- निन्दिषत्
- should revile / may revilereviles, maligns, speaks ill (verbal injury; ritual defamation)Verbविधिलिङ् (सम्भावना/आशीः), परस्मैपदम्, प्रथमपुरुषः, एकवचनम्Role क्रियाRoot √निन्द् (धातु) → निन्दिषत् (विधिलिङ्/आशीर्लिङ्-रूपम्, परस्मैपदम्)
- क्रियमाणम्
- being done, being performedbeing performed (the rite in progress; the operative karman)Participleनपुंसकलिङ्गः, द्वितीया, एकवचनम्; वर्तमानकालिकं कर्मणि-प्रत्ययान्तं (शानच्)Role KarmaRoot √कृ (धातु) → क्रियमाण (वर्तमान-कर्मणि कृदन्त)
- तपूंषि
- heats, burnings; austerity-fires (torments)burnings, heats, consuming torments (magical ‘fevers’/pains sent as retribution)Nounनपुंसकलिङ्गः, प्रथमा, बहुवचनम्Role KartāRoot तपस् (प्रातिपदिक) (वेद. बहुवचन-रूपम्)
- तस्मै
- to himPronounपुंलिङ्गः, चतुर्थी, एकवचनम्Role SampradānaRoot तद् (सर्वनाम)
- वृजिनानि
- evils, sins, misfortunesevils, harms, misfortunes (moral-ritual ‘crookedness’ returning upon him)Nounनपुंसकलिङ्गः, प्रथमा, बहुवचनम्Role Kartā (भवतु-इति आशयेन)Root वृजिन (प्रातिपदिक)
- सन्तु
- let them belet there be (injunctive/benedictive: performative imprecation)Verbलोट् (आज्ञार्थ/आशीः), परस्मैपदम्, तृतीयपुरुषः, बहुवचनम्Role क्रियाRoot √अस् (धातु)
- ब्रह्मद्विषम्
- the brahman-hater, one who hates sacred prayerthe hater of brahman (one who hates/attacks the spell and its priestly order)Noun/Adjectiveपुंलिङ्गः, द्वितीया, एकवचनम्Role KarmaRoot ब्रह्म-द्विष् (समास; प्रातिपदिक)
- द्यौः
- Heaven, the SkyNounस्त्रीलिङ्गः, प्रथमा, एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot द्यौ/द्युस् (प्रातिपदिक)
- अभिसंतपाति
- heats thoroughly, scorchesburns down upon, scorches thoroughly (heavenly heat as chastisement)Verbलट् (वर्तमान), परस्मैपदम्, प्रथमपुरुषः, एकवचनम्Role क्रियाRoot अभि-सम्-√तप् (धातु)
Sandhi Notes
- (1) ‘अतीव॒’ = अति + इव (निपात-समास/सन्धि) → अतीव.
- (2) ‘निन्दि॑षत्’ is taken as a Vedic optative (विधिलिङ्) 3sg of √निन्द्
- pada-text often preserves such forms without further sandhi.
- (3) ‘क्रि॒यमा॑णम्’ is present passive participle of √कृ, accusative neuter singular agreeing with ‘ब्रह्म’ (object: ‘the brahman being performed’).
- (4) ‘ब्रह्म॒द्विषं॒’ is a tatpuruṣa compound ‘ब्रह्म + द्विष्’ with accusative singular ‘-म्’.
- (5) ‘अभि॒संत॑पाति’ analyzed as verb with preverbs अभि+सम्
- internal sandhi yields the combined preverb sequence
Seer, deity and metre
- Rishi
- Atharvanic tradition.
- Devata
- Maruts; and Dyauḥ (Heaven) as punitive executor; brahman (mantra-power) as quasi-agent.
- Chandas
- Anuṣṭubh (probable; four pādas with ~8 syllables tendency, though Atharvanic anuṣṭubh is often flexible).
- Rasa
- Raudra and Bhayankara
Sāyaṇa construes brahma as the Atharvanic mantra/rite itself (and by extension the Brāhmaṇa who bears it). The offender is twofold: (1) one who ‘thinks against us’ (internal hostility, plotting), and (2) one who openly ‘reviles’ the rite while it is in performance (speech-act that pollutes/obstructs the karman). The imprecation assigns tapūṃṣi (‘tāpa’-like afflictions, burning pains/feverish torments) and vṛjināni (calamities arising from crookedness/adharma) to the offender; dyauḥ is taken as the cosmic executor whose heat (santāpa) falls upon the brahma-dviṣ.
Unknown (Atharvanic protective-imprecatory voice)
Ritual-protection, anti-obstruction imprecation, safeguarding brahman during performance.
Positions brahman as inviolable: to hate or mock it is to oppose the fabric of protection itself, inviting cosmic correction.
Maruts; Dyauḥ
Maruts guard the community and enforce group integrity; Dyauḥ acts as overarching punitive witness applying ‘heat’ to brahman-haters.
Indirect: prevents ritual sabotage that would prolong affliction; maintains protective field for healing rites.
Wards off slander, interference, and hostile scrutiny during ritual; turns it back as santāpa.
4 pādas with flexible syllable counts; strong split between accusation and verdict
Atharvanic anuṣṭubh often expands with participles (kriyamāṇam) and compounds (brahmadviṣam).
Declarative and punitive; the last pāda lands like a sentence.
Creates a ‘do-not-cross’ boundary around the rite; psychological deterrence against mockery/interference.
The Atharvan priest identifies the context: a rite in progress that is being reviled/obstructed by an adversary (explicitly or by hostile intent).
While maintaining the continuity of the karman (no break in recitation), he recites this mantra as a counter-imprecation directed toward the offender.
A protective boundary is reinforced (rakṣā): the priest mentally ‘assigns’ the tapūṃṣi and vṛjināni to the named/visualized offender (saṅkalpa).
The mantra is concluded with the cosmic sanction (dyauḥ), sealing the transfer of punitive heat onto the brahma-dviṣ.
The rite proceeds without acknowledging the reviler, thereby ritually denying him agency while the imprecation is believed to take effect.
Kauśika Sūtra: general application within rakṣā/abhicāra sequences for ‘brahmadviṣ’ and nindā of karman (exact sutra numbering varies by edition; commonly grouped under rites countering obstruction and reviling of sacrifice/mantra).
Atharvan/Brahman priest as guardian of the karman: he preserves ritual integrity, counters verbal pollution (nindā), and deploys mantra as juridical-punitive force.
Recited to secure privacy and sanctity of a healing/protective rite—especially when hostile neighbors/relatives mock, interrupt, or cast doubt.
At the start of a rite as a boundary-setting verse; repeated if interruption occurs.
Atharvan practitioner as ritual-guardian; may instruct on silence and respectful conduct.
Use as a ‘container’ invocation before group prayer/therapy/meditation to discourage disparagement and maintain respectful space.
brahman (mantra/spell-power as operative ‘substance’); tapas/santāpa (ritualized ‘heat’ as punitive force, conceptual rather than material)
tapas/santāpa as conceptual fire/heat; not a physical fire reference but a punitive ‘thermal’ force
The mantra treats speech as a volatile sacred substance: to insult it is to touch fire; ‘heat’ manifests as consequence and purification-through-pain for the offender.
Ritual failure due to obstruction; stress and destabilization caused by ridicule/hostility during healing rites; ‘heat’ as punitive mirror for hostile intent.
Protective containment of ritual space; ensures efficacy by neutralizing interference; psychosocial shielding for the patient/performer.
Protects daivavyapāśraya interventions; tapas imagery resonates with agni/tejas—here as punitive, not therapeutic.
Protecting therapeutic space from sabotage, stigma, or harassment; maintaining safe container for treatment.
brahmadviṣ (hater/reviler of the spell)
Punish and repel those who malign or obstruct an ongoing mantra-operation; enforce reverence toward brahman.
Pratiśedha (prohibitive boundary) + punitive reversion (santāpa) executed by cosmic witnesses (Maruts/Dyauḥ).
Slander, ridicule, interference, hostile surveillance during rites.
- मरुतः (marutaḥ)
- storm-guardians; collective force that defends the rite and the group
- अतीव (atīva)
- unbounded hostility; disproportionate malice as a moral imbalance
- ब्रह्म (brahma)
- vāc as operative law; the rite’s living ‘substance’
- क्रियमाणम् (kriyamāṇam)
- liminal vulnerability of an active rite; process-state needing protection
- तपूंषि (tapūṃṣi)
- self-consuming consequence; purgative/punitive fire
- वृजिनानि (vṛjināni)
- crooked outcomes; karmic/ritual backlash
- ब्रह्मद्विष् (brahmadviṣ)
- enemy of sacred order; one who attacks protective speech
- द्यौः (dyauḥ)
- overarching witness; cosmic ceiling that ‘presses down’ consequence
Protect sacred inner practice from inner ‘mockers’ (self-sabotage) and outer negativity; establish a firm boundary of reverence for vāc.
viśuddha (speech sanctity)
Slow inhalation; on exhale, silently affirm boundary; avoid heating pranayamas if already agitated.
A dome of clear sky (Dyauḥ) over the practice space; storm-guardians (Maruts) at the perimeter; hostile speech turns into harmless sparks outside the dome.
Protective vigilance without reactivity.
Use to discipline speech: refrain from sarcasm and contempt; cultivate satya and restraint as the ‘non-hate’ form of this protection.
Keep accusatory clauses slightly raised; let the final pāda descend with finality (sentence-like).
Mark contrast: ‘who maligns’ (nindiṣat) vs ‘let burnings be’ (tapūṃṣi…santu).
Controlled, protective, stern; not angry shouting.
Traditionally suited as a ‘rakṣā’ verse to guard the operation; pair with explicit instruction of silence/respect in the ritual space.
11 times
When your spiritual/healing practice is mocked, undermined, or interrupted; when you feel internal self-sabotage during sādhanā.
At the start of any serious practice session; before performing a healing prayer for someone vulnerable; when setting boundaries with detractors.
Stronger container for practice, reduced susceptibility to ridicule, increased confidence and steadiness.
Do not use to justify hostility toward critics; keep focus on boundary and dignity. Seek mediation if social conflict escalates.
No explicit plant or materia medica appears; the operative ‘substance’ is brahman itself—mantra as efficacious power. The verse conceptualizes punishment as ‘heat’ (tapūṃṣi, santāpa), a common Atharvanic idiom that can later be paired with physical media (fire, heated water, pungent herbs) in performance, but here remains primarily verbal-cosmic.
The category brahma-dviṣ (‘hater of brahman’) presumes a protected priestly-ritual domain: reviling the rite is not mere insult but an actionable transgression. The community (‘no’) is defended by invoking cosmic authorities (Maruts, Heaven), implying that the ritual specialist’s speech is socially and metaphysically privileged, and that opposition to it is framed as disorder warranting sanctioned harm.
The diction is broadly RV-compatible (Maruts, Dyauḥ, imprecatory optatives/injunctives), but the Atharvanic emphasis is sharper on ritual obstruction (kriyámāṇam ‘being performed’) and on brahman as a weaponized category in domestic/magical settings. The compound brahma-dviṣ is well-known in Vedic, yet in AV it often functions in explicitly apotropaic-legal registers.
In Gopatha’s Atharvanic theology, mantra is efficacious as brahman—speech that is itself a force when correctly deployed by the proper officiant. The verse’s logic matches that framework: reviling the karman is an attack on brahman, and cosmic order (Dyauḥ, Maruts) enforces the priestly utterance by converting hostile speech/thought into punitive ‘heat’ and misfortune.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Atharva Veda in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
