Sukta 2
उत् ति॑ष्ठे॒तः किमि॒च्छन्ती॒दमागा॑ अ॒हं त्वे॑डे अभि॒भूः स्वाद् गृ॒हात्। शू॒न्यै॒षी नि॑रृते॒ याज॒गन्थोत्ति॑ष्ठाराते॒ प्र प॑त॒ मेह रं॑स्थाः
út tiṣṭhetháḥ kím icchántī́dám ā́gāḥ aháṃ tvéḍe abhíbhūḥ svā́d gr̥hā́t | śū́nyaiṣī nírr̥te yā́jaganthóttiṣṭhārāte prá pata mā́ ihá raṃsthāḥ
Up, rise! What seeking hast thou come to this place? I address thee, overpowering thee—away from our own house. Thou emptiness-seeker, to Nirṛti thou hast gone: arise, O Arāti; fly forth—linger not here.
उठ, उठ! क्या ढूँढ के आई है यहाँ? मैं तुझे बोलता हूँ, तुझे हटा देता हूँ, हमारे घर से बाहर। तू खाली पन ढूँढने वाली है, बुराई की तरफ गई है। उठ, दूर हो जा, यहाँ मत रह।
An inauspicious female power (Arāti), linked with emptiness and Nirṛti, is commanded to rise up and leave: the speaker overpowers and drives her away from the house; she is told to fly forth and not linger.
At the threshold of new domestic life, the mind confronts scarcity narratives—fear of poverty, barrenness, relational emptiness. The mantra personifies these as Arāti and decisively expels them, reinforcing the home as a protected psychological container.
A home thrives when scarcity and hostility are not entertained; clear boundaries and decisive refusal of destructive patterns create space for abundance and peace.
To expel poverty, barrenness, and inauspicious forces from the house at the time of marriage/house-entry; to prevent the bride’s entry from being shadowed by Nirṛti.
उत् । तिष्ठेथः । किम् । इच्छन्ती । इदम् । आगाः । अहम् । त्वा । ईडे । अभिभूः । स्वात् । गृहात् । शून्य-एषी । निरृते । याजगन्थ । उत् । तिष्ठ । अराते । प्र । पत । मा । इह । रंस्थाः ।
Sayana treats the addressed entity as arāti/śūnyaiṣī—personified poverty, ill-luck, and household-desolation. The speaker’s ‘īḍe’ is not devotional but a formal confronting utterance; ‘abhibhūḥ’ marks ritual mastery. ‘To Nirṛti’ is the proper destination of inauspiciousness; the mantra is a dismissal (nirāsana) from the domestic sphere.
Atharvanic domestic protection tradition (AV 14.2; variable anukramaṇī attribution)
Nirṛti/Arāti expulsion, threshold protection, poverty-banishment charms
A classic Atharvanic dismissal: direct address to the inauspicious power, interrogation, and forceful eviction—speech as ritual policing of the household boundary.
Arāti (dismissed) and Nirṛti (destination/locus)
Arāti and Nirṛti represent dissolution, lack, and hostile obstruction; they belong outside the ordered household and are returned to their proper sphere.
By removal of inauspiciousness, supports fertility, prosperity, and mental stability.
Strong apotropaic eviction of poverty/hostility from the home at liminal entry.
Extended imperative clauses; AV domestic diction may expand beyond strict 8-syllable pādas
Incantatory prose-verse: interrogation + command sequence prioritized over meter
Staccato, expulsive; sharp imperatives
Creates a ‘banishing’ sonic force—questions to expose, then commands to eject.
At the threshold or near the hearth, the officiant performs a verbal dismissal of inauspiciousness.
He gestures outward (toward a direction associated with Nirṛti, often the south/west in later ritual mapping) while reciting the expulsion verbs (ut tiṣṭha, pra pata).
The household space is ritually claimed as ‘svād gṛhāt’—rightful domain—by the speaker.
The bride’s entry proceeds only after the ‘emptying-seeker’ is sent away.
Kauśika Sūtra: house-entry and expulsion of Arāti/Nirṛti in marriage context (edition-dependent citation).
Atharvan priest as apotropaic exorcist: he identifies the hostile force, names its destination (Nirṛti), and effects removal through performative speech and directional gesture.
Recited at threshold/doorway during house-entry (especially marriage) to banish poverty/inauspiciousness
Immediately before crossing into the home; or when misfortune feels ‘stuck’ in the house
Householder/elder performs verbal eviction; may accompany with sweeping outward
KauśS domestic expulsion/protection applications for AV verses addressing Arāti/Nirṛti (edition-dependent)
House-clearing prayer during moving-in, after conflict, or when beginning financial discipline
Domestic threshold/house-space (ritual boundary); Personified Arāti (poverty/hostility) as target
The ‘house’ is the operative vessel; the threshold is implied as the expulsion point. Space itself is treated as a substance that can be purified by command.
Poverty/inauspiciousness as etiological field; barrenness/emptiness; depressive dissolution (Nirṛti)
Psychic and ritual eviction; reassertion of agency and boundary; ‘naming the intruder’ reduces its hold
Addresses depletion/ojas-loss symbolically; aligns with removing ‘ālasyā/viṣāda’ (lethargy/despair) as obstacles to prosperity and health
Cognitive boundary-setting against scarcity mindset; anti-rumination practice; home-as-safe-base ritual.
Arāti personification; inauspicious household influences
Expel Arāti (hostility/poverty) from the house; consign her to Nirṛti; prevent lingering
Direct address + interrogation (‘what seeking…’) + overpowering claim + banishment to proper realm + flight command
Poverty, barrenness, domestic misfortune, chronic conflict-energy
Household stability and abundance (by removing lack)
Banishing ‘void-seeking’ tendencies; cultivate fullness (pūrṇatā) in the heart-home
muladhara (security)
Forceful exhale practice (one or three sharp expulsions) followed by calm nasal breathing
A dark form exits the doorway and dissolves into a distant wasteland; the home fills with warm light
Protective resolve
Use sparingly: one decisive recitation, then shift to constructive action (order, cleanliness, generosity) to prevent the ‘void’ from returning.
Sharper udātta peaks on imperatives (ut tiṣṭha, pra pata, mā…); clipped delivery
Pause after the interrogative; then deliver commands in a descending, final cadence
Firm, expulsive, authoritative; not shouted
Traditionally paired with outward sweeping or spitting symbolically (where culturally appropriate); modern use can substitute a decisive outward hand sweep.
Moving into a new home; post-conflict house reset; marriage house-entry; financial anxiety periods
At the doorway before entry; after cleaning; at the start of a new household routine
Psychological clearing, strengthened boundary, reduced sense of ‘stuck misfortune’
Avoid reinforcing stigma around poverty—pair with compassionate, practical measures; do not direct at people
No herb is named; the ‘technology’ is spatial and verbal: boundary-protection and expulsion. The mantra functions as a ritual ‘firewall’ for the house, routing misfortune to Nirṛti.
The priestly speaker claims authority to define what belongs in the house and what must be expelled. Domestic well-being is construed as dependent on correct Atharvanic speech-acts, reinforcing ritual specialists’ social power.
The direct address to personified abstractions (Arāti, ‘emptiness-seeker’) and the imperative chain of dismissal is characteristically Atharvanic and pragmatically magical, less hymnic than RV style.
Gopatha’s Atharvanic logic legitimizes expulsion rites by mapping misfortune to specific deities/regions (notably Nirṛti) and by treating correct utterance as causative. This mantra exemplifies that causative mapping: name → destination → removal.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.