विष्णु-ब्रह्म-विवाद-वर्णनम्
Description of the Viṣṇu–Brahmā Dispute and Brahmā’s Confusion
मायया मोहितश्शम्भोस्तदा लीलात्मनः प्रभोः । अविज्ञाय स्वजनकं तमवोचं प्रहर्षितः
māyayā mohitaśśambhostadā līlātmanaḥ prabhoḥ | avijñāya svajanakaṃ tamavocaṃ praharṣitaḥ
Alors, abusé par la Māyā de Śambhu—le Seigneur dont la nature même est le jeu divin—ne le reconnaissant pas comme mon propre géniteur, je lui adressai la parole dans une grande allégresse.
Brahma (narrated within the Sṛṣṭi-khaṇḍa creation account; framed by Suta Goswami’s narration)
Tattva Level: pasha
Shiva Form: Sadāśiva
Role: teaching
Cosmic Event: Tirodhāna in action: Brahmā’s non-recognition of his source due to Śambhu’s māyā during cosmogonic unfolding
It teaches that Māyā (bondage/veil) operates under Śiva’s lordship (Pati), and even exalted beings like Brahmā can fail to recognize the Supreme; liberation arises when the veil is removed by Śiva’s grace and right knowledge.
By calling Śiva “līlātmaka” (whose nature is divine play), the verse supports Saguna worship: the Lord appears in accessible forms and acts within creation; Linga-worship trains the devotee to recognize the Supreme beyond Māyā, even when He is present in a simple, symbolic form.
A key takeaway is to counter Māyā through steady japa of the Pañcākṣarī (“Om Namaḥ Śivāya”) with devotion and humility, supported by Śiva-pūjā (including bhasma/Tripuṇḍra and Rudrākṣa where traditional) to cultivate recognition of Śiva as the inner Lord.