Shloka 57
Ahiṃsā as Threefold Restraint (Mind–Speech–Action) and the Ethics of Consumption
यदि पुत्रसमं शिष्य॑ गुरुहन्यादकारणे । आत्मन: कामकारेण सोऊपि हिंस्र: प्रजायते
yadi putrasamaṁ śiṣyaṁ gurur hanyād akāraṇe | ātmanaḥ kāmakāreṇa so 'pi hiṁsraḥ prajāyate ||
Yudhiṣṭhira dit : Si un maître, poussé par son caprice et son désir, venait à tuer un disciple semblable à un fils, sans motif légitime, alors ce maître lui-même devient un homme violent. L’autorité ne sanctifie pas la cruauté : même un guru encourt le blâme moral lorsqu’il agit par élan égoïste plutôt que selon le dharma.
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
Even a guru is not above dharma: killing a disciple without just cause, out of personal desire or whim, makes the teacher culpable and morally ‘violent’. Legitimate authority cannot excuse adharma.
Yudhiṣṭhira is articulating an ethical principle within the Anuśāsana Parva’s instruction on right conduct: he frames a conditional case about a guru harming a disciple to clarify that unjustified violence—especially by one entrusted with care—corrupts the doer.