यच्च ब्रवीषि गीर्वाणा न संति सन्ति चेत्कुतः । कुत्रापि नैव दृश्यंते तेन मे विस्मयो महान्
yacca bravīṣi gīrvāṇā na saṃti santi cetkutaḥ | kutrāpi naiva dṛśyaṃte tena me vismayo mahān
Y lo que dices, oh portavoz entre los dioses: «no existen»; pero si existen, ¿de dónde provienen? No se les ve en parte alguna; por eso mi asombro es inmenso.
A questioning interlocutor (likely a sage) addressing a deva; exact identity not in snippet
Scene: A learned interlocutor, hands raised in inquiry, expresses astonishment while addressing a divine speaker; a quiet assembly of sages/devas listens as the debate turns on ‘seen vs unseen’.
The verse frames a Purāṇic inquiry into belief and proof—questioning claims about existence when something is not directly perceived.
None is named in this verse; it is part of a doctrinal dialogue rather than a site-specific māhātmya line.
No explicit ritual is prescribed here; it is a logical challenge within the discourse.