तत्र पूज्यपदार्थोक्तिः परिभाषासमन्वितः । शब्दोऽयं नोपचारेण चान्यत्र ह्युपचारतः ॥ २० ॥
tatra pūjyapadārthoktiḥ paribhāṣāsamanvitaḥ | śabdo'yaṃ nopacāreṇa cānyatra hyupacārataḥ || 20 ||
En ese contexto, la afirmación se refiere a un objeto venerable y va acompañada de una regla definitoria (paribhāṣā). Allí este término no se usa en sentido secundario o figurado; en otros lugares, en cambio, se emplea sólo por aplicación figurativa.
Sanatkumara (teaching Narada in a definitional/technical discourse)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: none
It teaches that liberation-oriented instruction depends on precise meaning: when a term is defined by a paribhāṣā and points to a worship-worthy reality, it should be taken in its primary sense, not diluted into metaphor.
By insisting on primary meaning for a ‘pūjya’ referent, the verse supports focused devotion—worship is directed to the truly venerable object indicated by scripture, rather than to a merely figurative substitute.
It highlights interpretive discipline akin to Vedāṅga Vyākaraṇa and Mīmāṃsā: distinguishing mukhya-vṛtti (primary meaning) from upacāra (secondary usage) using paribhāṣā rules.