आत्यन्तिक-लयहेतुः: तापत्रय-विवेचनम् तथा ‘भगवान्/वासुदेव’ शब्दार्थः
Threefold Suffering and the Path to Final Liberation; Meaning of Bhagavān and Vāsudeva
तत्र पूज्यपदार्थोक्तिपरिभाषासमन्वितः शब्दो ऽयं नोपचारेण अन्यत्र ह्य् उपचारतः
tatra pūjyapadārthoktiparibhāṣāsamanvitaḥ śabdo 'yaṃ nopacāreṇa anyatra hy upacārataḥ
In that context, this word—qualified by the rule that it denotes a venerable and worthy referent—is not to be taken in a figurative sense; elsewhere it is applied only by figurative usage.
Sage Parāśara (teaching Maitreya)
Speaker: Parasara
Topic: How “Bhagavān” should be understood as primary (non-figurative) only for the truly venerable supreme referent
Teaching: Philosophical
Quality: analytical
Concept: “Bhagavān” is to be taken in its primary sense only for the supremely worship-worthy reality; elsewhere it is merely figurative usage.
Vedantic Theme: Brahman
Application: Use discernment in theological language—reserve ultimate predicates for the Supreme, while honoring others without conflating levels of divinity.
Vishishtadvaita: Supports graded ontology: the Supreme Person uniquely bears absolute lordship, while other ‘lords’ are so only by upacāra (dependent designation).
Vishnu Form: Vasudeva
Bhakti Type: Shanta
Vyuha Form: Vasudeva
This verse sets a hermeneutic rule: in the given doctrinal context, the key term must be taken in its primary sense, while in other contexts it may be applied only figuratively.
He indicates that a technical definition (paribhāṣā) governs the word’s meaning—especially when it points to a worship-worthy referent—so the reader should avoid forcing a secondary, metaphorical reading.
By insisting on primary denotation for the worship-worthy referent, the text supports a theologically “real” Supreme—consistent with Vaiṣṇava schools that treat the Lord’s supremacy as literal, not merely metaphorical.