मायामोह-प्रवर्तन, वेदमार्ग-बहिष्कार, तथा पाषण्ड-संसर्ग-दोषः
Māyāmoha’s Delusion, Rejection of the Vedic Path, and the Fault of Heretical Association
तस्माद् एतान् नरो नग्नांस् त्रयीसंत्यागदूषितान् सर्वदा वर्जयेत् प्राज्ञ आलापस्पर्शनादिषु
tasmād etān naro nagnāṃs trayīsaṃtyāgadūṣitān sarvadā varjayet prājña ālāpasparśanādiṣu
Therefore a wise person should always avoid such “nagna,” tainted by abandoning the Threefold Veda—keeping away in speech, in touch, and in all similar dealings.
Sage Parāśara (in instruction to Maitreya)
Speaker: Parasara
Topic: How a prājña should relate to ‘nagna’ ascetics who abandon the trayī (Veda)
Teaching: Ethical
Quality: authoritative
Concept: The wise are instructed to avoid intimate dealings—speech, touch, and the like—with those deemed ‘nagna,’ characterized here as forsaking Vedic authority.
Vedantic Theme: Dharma
Application: Practice spiritual discernment: choose teachers and communities with ethical integrity and accountable traditions; keep clear boundaries with manipulative or antinomian influences.
Vishishtadvaita: Legitimate śāstra and sampradāya function as reliable means for devotion; rejecting the trayī is treated as severing oneself from divinely ordered guidance.
This verse treats fidelity to the Veda as a marker of dharmic legitimacy; abandoning the Trayī is portrayed as a spiritual corruption that a wise person should avoid.
Parāśara frames association itself as influential: one should avoid even casual interaction—talk, touch, and related contact—with those seen as having rejected Vedic foundations.
In the Vishnu Purana, sustaining dharma and Vedic order is part of aligning with Vishnu as the supreme sustaining principle; right conduct supports the cosmic order Vishnu preserves.