मायामोह-प्रवर्तन, वेदमार्ग-बहिष्कार, तथा पाषण्ड-संसर्ग-दोषः
Māyāmoha’s Delusion, Rejection of the Vedic Path, and the Fault of Heretical Association
पुंसां जटाधरणमौण्ड्यवतां वृथैव मोघाशिनाम् अखिलशौचनिराकृतानाम् तोयप्रदानपितृपिण्डबहिष्कृतानां संभाषणाद् अपि नरा नरकं प्रयान्ति
puṃsāṃ jaṭādharaṇamauṇḍyavatāṃ vṛthaiva moghāśinām akhilaśaucanirākṛtānām toyapradānapitṛpiṇḍabahiṣkṛtānāṃ saṃbhāṣaṇād api narā narakaṃ prayānti
For men who merely wear matted locks or a shaven head in vain—who eat without purpose, cast aside all purity, and abandon the offerings of water and the ancestral piṇḍa—association itself becomes perilous: even by speaking with such people, others are said to fall toward hell.
Sage Parāśara (teaching Maitreya)
Concept: External marks of renunciation (jaṭā or muṇḍa) without śauca and pitṛ-tarpaṇa are condemned, and even verbal association is framed as leading toward naraka.
Vedantic Theme: Dharma
Application: Prioritize integrity over religious display; keep daily disciplines (śauca, gratitude to ancestors/lineage) and avoid communities that normalize hypocrisy and contempt for dharma.
Vishishtadvaita: Affirms that embodied duties (nitya/naimittika, including pitṛ-kṛtya) are meaningful within Bhagavān’s order; mere outward signs without inner alignment do not please the indwelling Lord.
Bhakti Type: Shanta
This verse treats purity not as mere ritual display but as lived discipline; rejecting śauca while keeping external signs of renunciation is portrayed as spiritually dangerous and socially contaminating.
He states that even conversation with those who abandon core duties—like pitṛ offerings and basic purity—can pull others toward negative karmic outcomes, emphasizing vigilance in companionship.
Though not named in the verse, the teaching assumes Vishnu as the upholder of ṛta/dharma; violating dharmic duties disrupts the order sustained by the Supreme, leading to karmic consequence.