तत् कथ्यतां महाभाग विशेषो भवतानयोः ज्ञातुम् इच्छाम्य् अहं को ऽत्र गजः को वा नराधिपः
tat kathyatāṃ mahābhāga viśeṣo bhavatānayoḥ jñātum icchāmy ahaṃ ko 'tra gajaḥ ko vā narādhipaḥ
Tell me then, O great and fortunate one, the distinguishing truth between these two. I wish to know clearly: here, which is the elephant, and which indeed is the lord among men—the king?
A questioning interlocutor in the narrative (addressing a revered personage as ‘mahābhāga’); exact identification varies by recension/edition
Concept: Clear knowledge arises from asking for viśeṣa (differentiating principle) rather than remaining at the level of undifferentiated perception.
Vedantic Theme: Atman
Application: When confused, formulate the exact question: ‘What is the differentiator?’—then test answers against observable relations and outcomes.
Vishishtadvaita: Affirms that difference (bheda) is knowable and meaningful within an ordered whole—consistent with Viśiṣṭādvaita’s real distinctions in unity.
The verse frames kingship as something to be recognized by defining qualities, aligning royal sovereignty with dharma rather than mere appearance or power.
By posing a direct question—“which is the elephant and which is the king?”—the text invites criteria-based judgment, a common Purana technique for conveying ethical and social order.
Even when Vishnu is not named in the verse, the Purana’s framework treats righteous kingship as part of Vishnu’s sustaining power (sthiti), where proper rule mirrors the divine maintenance of universal order.