Pracetās, Māriṣā, Dakṣa’s Re-manifestation, and the Brahma-parastava; Cyclic Creation and Genealogies
तपांसि मम नष्टानि हतं ब्रह्मविदां धनम् हृतो विवेकः केनापि योषिन् मोहाय निर्मिता
tapāṃsi mama naṣṭāni hataṃ brahmavidāṃ dhanam hṛto vivekaḥ kenāpi yoṣin mohāya nirmitā
My austerities are ruined; the treasure of the knowers of Brahman is struck down. Someone has stolen my discernment—this woman has been fashioned as a snare of delusion.
Unspecified in the provided excerpt (a male ascetic/knower lamenting loss of tapas and viveka within the Parasara–Maitreya narrative frame)
Speaker: Parasara
Topic: The peril of kāma and saṅga for ascetics, and how delusion can overthrow tapas and brahma-jñāna-oriented discipline
Teaching: Ethical
Quality: admonitory and psychologically incisive
Concept: Even one intent on Brahman may lose viveka when kāma, personified through alluring forms, eclipses discrimination and undermines tapas.
Vedantic Theme: Maya
Application: Guard attention and senses; avoid situations that inflame craving, and re-establish discernment through daily self-review and disciplined boundaries.
Vishishtadvaita: Brahman is knowable, yet the jīva’s agency is conditioned by guṇas; hence reliance on disciplined devotion and grace is implied to steady viveka.
Vishnu Form: Para-Brahman
Bhakti Type: Shanta
The verse frames viveka as the essential spiritual safeguard; when it is “stolen,” even accumulated tapas collapses and the seeker falls into मोह (delusion).
Within the Purana’s didactic storytelling, Parasara uses cautionary laments like this to show that attachment can overpower prior merit, and that disciplined discrimination is required to remain aligned with dharma.
Though Vishnu is not named in the verse, the Purana’s underlying theology treats liberation as stability in true knowledge under the Supreme Reality; this warning highlights the need to transcend māyā and rest in the higher order upheld by Vishnu.