राज्ञो धर्मरतेस्तस्य च्छिद्रं नावाप किंचन । अतः पुरारेः पुरतो व्रजित्वा किं वदेद्विधिः
rājño dharmaratestasya cchidraṃ nāvāpa kiṃcana | ataḥ purāreḥ purato vrajitvā kiṃ vadedvidhiḥ
In that king—delighting in dharma—Vidhi (Brahmā) found no fault at all. Therefore, having gone into the presence of Purāri (Śiva), what could Vidhi possibly say?
Skanda (deduced; Kāśīkhaṇḍa context)
Scene: Brahmā stands before Śiva (Purāri) in a sanctum-like setting, hands folded, unable to speak any fault against a dharma-delighting king; Śiva’s calm, penetrating gaze signifies moral finality.
True dharma in a ruler is portrayed as spotless; in the presence of Śiva, even Brahmā has no grounds for accusation or complaint.
Indirectly Kāśī itself—where dharma, devotion, and Śiva’s immediate presence define the kṣetra’s spiritual authority.
None explicitly; the verse emphasizes ethical qualification (dharmaratatva) rather than a specific rite.