HomeMatsya PuranaAdh. 163Shloka 2
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 2

Matsya Purana — Narasimha’s Victory over Hiraṇyakaśipu and the Catalogue of Apocalyptic Omens

बालसूर्यमुखाश्चान्ये धूमकेतुमुखास्तथा अर्धचन्द्रार्धवक्त्राश्च अग्निदीप्तमुखास्तथा //

bālasūryamukhāścānye dhūmaketumukhāstathā ardhacandrārdhavaktrāśca agnidīptamukhāstathā //

Others are described with faces like the rising (young) sun; others with faces like a comet; others with half-moon, half-formed faces; and others with faces blazing like fire.

bāla-sūrya-mukhāḥhaving faces like the young/rising sun
bāla-sūrya-mukhāḥ:
caand
ca:
anyeothers
anye:
dhūma-ketu-mukhāḥhaving comet-like faces
dhūma-ketu-mukhāḥ:
tathālikewise/also
tathā:
ardha-candra-ardha-vaktrāḥhaving faces that are half-moon and half-face (partly crescent-shaped)
ardha-candra-ardha-vaktrāḥ:
caand
ca:
agni-dīpta-mukhāḥhaving faces shining/blazing like fire
agni-dīpta-mukhāḥ:
tathālikewise/also
tathā:
Sūta (narrating the Matsya Purana’s discourse; iconographic/omen description tradition)
AgniSūryaDhūmaketu
IconographyPratima LakshanaOmensCelestial imageryMatsya Purana

FAQs

This verse does not directly describe Pralaya; it uses cosmic lights (sun, comet, fire, moon) as symbolic markers to classify extraordinary or ominous-looking forms, a style often used in Purāṇic descriptions rather than a dissolution narrative.

Indirectly, such descriptions function as diagnostic signs: rulers and householders were expected to heed unusual celestial/fiery portents and consult learned authorities for proper rites and governance decisions, aligning action with dharma when abnormal signs appear.

The verse supports iconographic/ritual classification—describing face-types used in identifying or portraying beings in sacred art; in temple practice this informs how certain fierce or luminous aspects may be visually represented and ritually contextualized.