HomeMatsya PuranaAdh. 161Shloka 27
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 27

Matsya Purana — Hiranyakashipu’s Boons

यदा वरमदोत्सिक्तश् चोदितः कालधर्मतः यज्ञियानकरोद्दैत्यान् अयज्ञियाश्च देवताः //

yadā varamadotsiktaś coditaḥ kāladharmataḥ yajñiyānakaroddaityān ayajñiyāśca devatāḥ //

When, intoxicated by the pride of a boon, he was driven onward by the law of Time (kāladharma), he made the Daityas fit recipients of sacrifice, and rendered the gods unfit for sacrificial offerings.

yadāwhen
yadā:
vara-mada-utsiktaḥpuffed up (utsiktaḥ) with the intoxication/pride (mada) of a boon (vara)
vara-mada-utsiktaḥ:
coditaḥimpelled, urged
coditaḥ:
kāla-dharmataḥby the principle/law of Time, according to cosmic order
kāla-dharmataḥ:
yajñiyānfit for yajña, worthy of sacrificial offering
yajñiyān:
akarotmade (he made)
akarot:
daityānthe Daityas (a class of anti-gods/demons)
daityān:
ayajñiyāḥunfit for yajña, not to be offered to
ayajñiyāḥ:
caand
ca:
devatāḥthe gods (Devas).
devatāḥ:
Sūta (narrator) relaying the Matsya Purana’s account (contextually within the Matsya–Manu dialogue frame)
DaityasDevatāḥKāla (Time)
DevasuraYajnaKāladharmaBoonsCosmic Order

FAQs

It does not describe Pralaya directly; it highlights kāladharma—Time’s cosmic governance—by which the ritual status of beings can be reversed, a theme that underlies larger cycles of rise, decline, and world-order change.

It warns that pride born of power or “boons” can distort dharma; for kings and householders, it implies vigilance in maintaining proper yajña-order—supporting rightful ritual recipients and not letting arrogance or adharma invert social-religious hierarchy.

The ritual point is central: “yajñiya/ayajñiya” defines who is eligible to receive sacrificial offerings, reflecting how yajña legitimacy can shift under adharma and kāla; no Vāstu or temple-architecture rule is stated in this verse.