Kīcaka-vadha-pratisaṃjñā: Rumor in Matsya and the Kaurava Scouts’ Report (कीचकवध-प्रतिसंज्ञा)
न हि दुःखं समाप्रोषि सैरन्ध्री यदुपाश्रुते । तेन मां दुःखितामेवं पृच्छसे प्रहसन्निव,सैरन्ध्री जो दुःख भोग रही है, उसे दूर तो करोगी नहीं या उसका अनुभव तो तुम्हें होता नहीं; इसीलिये मुझ दुखियाकी केवल हँसी उड़ानेके लिये ऐसा प्रश्न कर रही हो?
na hi duḥkhaṃ samāproṣi sairandhrī yad upāśrute | tena māṃ duḥkhitām evaṃ pṛcchase prahasan niva ||
Vaiśampāyana said: “O Sairandhrī, you do not truly share in the suffering that has come upon me; nor can you remove it. Therefore you question me in this way as if merely to mock—laughing at one who is already afflicted.”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
The verse highlights an ethical sensitivity: questioning a sufferer without empathy can become cruelty. True concern either shares the burden or seeks to relieve it; otherwise, inquiry may feel like ridicule.
In the Virāṭa court setting, Sairandhrī (Draupadī in disguise) speaks with a woman who is distressed. The speaker responds sharply, saying Sairandhrī neither experiences nor can remove her pain, so her questioning seems like mockery.