Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 55

Dasyu-maryādā and Buddhi-guided Rāja-nīti (दस्युमर्यादा तथा बुद्धिप्रधान-राजनीति)

कस्माद देवासुरा: पूर्वमन्योन्यमभिजघ्निरे । यदि कालेन निर्याणं सुखं दु:खं भवाभवौ,यदि कालसे ही मृत्यु, दुःख-सुख और उन्नति अवनति आदिका सम्पादन होता है, तब पूर्वकालमें देवताओं और असुरों ने क्‍यों आपसमें युद्ध करके एक दूसरे का वध किया?

brahmadatta uvāca | kasmād devāsurāḥ pūrvam anyonyam abhijaghnire | yadi kālena niryāṇaṃ sukhaṃ duḥkhaṃ bhavābhavau |

Brahmadatta said: “If departure from life, as well as happiness and sorrow, rise and fall—indeed all attainment and loss—are brought about by Time alone, then why did the gods and the asuras in former days strike one another down in battle? What purpose could violence serve if Time is the sole disposer of outcomes?”

कस्मात्from what cause? why?
कस्मात्:
Apadana
TypePronoun
Rootकिम्
Formneuter, ablative, singular
देवgods
देव:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootदेव
Formmasculine, nominative, plural
असुराःasuras
असुराः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअसुर
Formmasculine, nominative, plural
पूर्वम्formerly, earlier
पूर्वम्:
Adhikarana
TypeIndeclinable
Rootपूर्व
अन्योन्यम्each other, mutually
अन्योन्यम्:
Karma
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअन्योन्य
अभिजघ्निरेthey struck/killed
अभिजघ्निरे:
TypeVerb
Rootहन्
Formperfect (liṭ), 3rd, plural, parasmaipada
यदिif
यदि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootयदि
कालेनby time/fate
कालेन:
Karana
TypeNoun
Rootकाल
Formmasculine, instrumental, singular
निर्याणम्departure (death)
निर्याणम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootनिर्याण
Formneuter, nominative, singular
सुखम्happiness
सुखम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootसुख
Formneuter, nominative, singular
दुःखम्sorrow
दुःखम्:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootदुःख
Formneuter, nominative, singular
भवbecoming/existence
भव:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootभव
Formmasculine, nominative, singular
अभवौnon-existence; (as a pair with) existence/non-existence
अभवौ:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootअभव
Formmasculine, nominative, dual

ब्रह्मदत्त उवाच

B
Brahmadatta
D
Devas
A
Asuras
K
Kāla (Time)

Educational Q&A

The verse frames a philosophical challenge: if Time (kāla) alone governs death, pleasure, pain, and rise or fall, then human (or divine) agency—especially violent action—seems purposeless. It invites reflection on how moral responsibility and effort can be meaningful even within a worldview that emphasizes kāla as a supreme force.

Brahmadatta questions a doctrine that attributes all outcomes to Time. He points to the ancient wars between devas and asuras as evidence: if Time alone determines victory, defeat, and death, why did they engage in mutual slaughter? The question presses the interlocutor to reconcile cosmic determinism with the observed reality of conflict and choice.