Shloka 160
कर्णेन युधिष्ठिरानीकविदारणम् / Karṇa’s Breach of Yudhiṣṭhira’s Battle-Line
देवपुत्रमहं मन्ये क्षत्रियाणां कुलोद्धवम् | विसृष्टमवबोधार्थ कुलस्थेति मतिर्मम,राजन! मैं किसी तरह इस बातपर विश्वास नहीं करता कि कर्ण सूतकुलमें उत्पन्न हुआ है। मैं इसे क्षत्रियकुलमें उत्पन्न देवपुत्र मानता हूँ। मेरा तो यह विश्वास है कि इसकी माताने अपने गुप्त रहस्यको छिपानेके लिये तथा इसे अन्य कुलका बालक विख्यात करनेके लिये ही सूतकुलमें छोड़ दिया होगा
devaputram ahaṃ manye kṣatriyāṇāṃ kulodbhavam | visṛṣṭam avabodhārthaṃ kulastheti matir mama, rājan |
Duryodhana said: “I regard him as a son of the gods, born in a Kṣatriya line. My conviction is this, O king: he was deliberately abandoned so that people would take him to belong to a different household—so that the truth might not be recognized.”
दुर्योधन उवाच
Educational Q&A
The verse highlights how claims of birth and lineage are used to confer honor and legitimacy; Duryodhana frames Karna’s worth as inherently Kṣatriya/divine, challenging social stigma attached to the sūta identity and using lineage as an ethical-political argument for respect.
Duryodhana argues before the king that Karna is not truly of the sūta community; he insists Karna is divinely born in a Kṣatriya line and suggests he was intentionally abandoned to conceal the mother’s secret and make him appear to belong to another family.