HomeChanakya NitiCh. 2Shloka 2
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 2

Virtuous Company — Chanakya Niti

भोज्यं भोजनशक्तिश्च रतिशक्तिर्वराङ्गना ।

विभवो दानशक्तिश्च नाल्पस्य तपसः फलम् ॥

bhojyaṃ bhojanaśaktiś ca ratiśaktir varāṅganā |

vibhavo dānaśaktiś ca nālpasya tapasaḥ phalam ||

The verse describes that provisions for enjoyment (food), the capacity to consume, sexual capacity and a beautiful woman, along with wealth and the capacity to give, are not regarded as the results of minor austerity; the tradition frames them as outcomes requiring substantial ascetic effort.

भोज्यम्food (that which is to be eaten)
भोज्यम्:
TypeNoun
Rootभोज्य
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
भोजनशक्तिःpower/ability to eat
भोजनशक्तिः:
TypeNoun
Rootभोजनशक्ति
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
FormConjunction
रतिशक्तिःsexual capacity
रतिशक्तिः:
TypeNoun
Rootरतिशक्ति
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
वराङ्गनाa beautiful woman
वराङ्गना:
TypeNoun
Rootवराङ्गना
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
विभवःwealth/prosperity
विभवः:
TypeNoun
Rootविभव
FormMasculine, Nominative, Singular
दानशक्तिःpower to give/charity
दानशक्तिः:
TypeNoun
Rootदानशक्ति
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
and
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
FormConjunction
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
FormNegation
अल्पस्यof little (small)
अल्पस्य:
TypeAdjective
Rootअल्प
FormMasculine/Neuter, Genitive, Singular
तपसःof austerity/penance
तपसः:
TypeNoun
Rootतपस्
FormNeuter, Genitive, Singular
फलम्fruit/result
फलम्:
TypeNoun
Rootफल
FormNeuter, Nominative, Singular
Chanakya (Kautilya)
अनुष्टुप्
Ancient EthicsSanskrit LiteratureNīti-ŚāstraHistory of Political Thought
Food (bhojya)Digestive capacity (bhojanaśakti)Sexual potency (ratiśakti)Beautiful woman (varāṅganā)Wealth/prosperity (vibhava)Charitable capacity (dānaśakti)Austerity (tapas)

FAQs

In nīti (didactic-ethical) literature associated with early and medieval Sanskrit textual culture, verses often link worldly capacities—enjoyment, prosperity, and giving—to prior merit and tapas (austerity). This reflects a broader Indic framework in which personal fortune and social standing are frequently interpreted through karmic or ascetic causality rather than purely material explanations.

The verse employs tapas as a causal category for desirable worldly outcomes, presenting a gradation between “minor” and “substantial” austerity. It does not specify practices, but uses tapas as a conventional marker of accumulated merit or disciplined effort that is imagined to yield both personal capacities (e.g., strength/ability) and external resources (e.g., wealth).

The construction pairs objects with corresponding capacities (bhogya with bhojanaśakti; vibhava with dānaśakti), emphasizing that possession alone is incomplete without the ability to use or enact it. The inclusion of varāṅganā alongside ratiśakti reflects a conventional, period-specific register of prosperity and enjoyment (bhoga) in Sanskrit gnomic poetry, documenting elite social imaginaries rather than offering a universal ethical definition.