लक्ष्मणक्रोधः · दैवपुरुषकारविवादः
Lakshmana’s Wrath and the Debate on Destiny vs Human Effort
किन्नाम कृपणं दैवमशक्तमभिशंससि ॥७॥
पापयोस्ते कथं नाम तयोश्शङ्का न विद्यते ।
kin nāma kṛpaṇaṃ daivam aśaktam abhiśaṃsasi ||7||
pāpayos te kathaṃ nāma tayoḥ śaṅkā na vidyate |
Warum preist du dieses erbärmliche, machtlose Ding, das man „Schicksal“ nennt? Und wie kommt es, dass du gegen jene beiden Übeltäter keinen Verdacht hegst?
Why do you extol this pitiable and powerless destiny? Why don't you doubt those two vicious persons (Dasaratha and Kaikeyi)?
Moral accountability: Lakshmana insists that ethical evaluation should focus on human choices and wrongdoing rather than attributing events to fate.
Lakshmana urges Rama to recognize culpability behind the exile decision, rather than accepting it as destiny.
Justice-oriented discernment—Lakshmana’s refusal to let “fate” erase responsibility.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.