Dīkṣā, Mantra-Types, Mantra-Doṣas, and Qualifications of Ācārya–Śiṣya
म्योद्वयं हृदयं शीर्षे वषड्वौषट्कमध्यमः । यस्य स्याद्भेदितो मंत्रस्त्याज्यः क्लिष्टफलप्रदः ॥ ३४ ॥
myodvayaṃ hṛdayaṃ śīrṣe vaṣaḍvauṣaṭkamadhyamaḥ | yasya syādbhedito maṃtrastyājyaḥ kliṣṭaphalapradaḥ || 34 ||
Wenn ein Mantra am Ende die zwei Silben „myo“ hat, am Anfang das „hṛdaya“ (Herz-Samen) setzt und in der Mitte die vaṣaṭ/vauṣaṭ-Formel einfügt, dann ist dieses Mantra—zerbrochen und falsch geordnet—zu verwerfen, denn es bringt nur mühsame, beschwerliche Früchte.
Sanatkumara (teaching Narada in a technical Vedanga/ritual context)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: karuna
It stresses that spiritual practice must be grounded in śāstric correctness: a mantra that is structurally “broken” (bhedita) is not merely ineffective, but can produce obstructed or distressing outcomes, so discernment and proper transmission are essential.
By implication, it teaches that devotion is strengthened—not replaced—by right method: a sincere bhakta should rely on a properly received and correctly formed mantra rather than improvising ritual elements that distort the practice.
A practical mantra-śāstra point tied to Vedanga-style technicality: the placement of mantra components (head/śīrṣa, heart/hṛdaya, and vaṣaṭ/vauṣaṭ oblation formulas) matters, and improper sequencing is treated as a ritual defect (doṣa).