सत्यधर्मप्रतिपादनम्
Rama’s Defense of Truth and Dharma in Reply to Jabali
न चापि कालोऽय मुपागतश्शनैर्यथा मया नास्तिकवागुदीरिता।निवर्तनार्थं तव राम कारणात् प्रसादनार्थं च मयैतदीरितम्।।2.109.39।।
na cāpi kālo'yam upāgataś śanair yathā mayā nāstikavāg udīritā |
nivartanārthaṃ tava rāma kāraṇāt prasādanārthaṃ ca mayaitad īritam || 2.109.39 ||
এতিয়া ধীৰে ধীৰে উপযুক্ত কাল উপস্থিত হৈছে; সেয়ে মই তেনেদৰে ক’লোঁ। হে ৰাম, নাস্তিকবাক্য যেন লাগিছিল সেই কথাবোৰ মই তোমাৰ হিতাৰ্থে—তোমাক নিবৃত্ত কৰিবলৈ আৰু তোমাৰ প্ৰসাদ লাভ কৰিবলৈ—উচ্চাৰণ কৰিছিলোঁ।
How can I advise others for a virtuous conduct or how can I attain heaven if I break the vow which I follow at present.
Ends-versus-means tension: persuasive intent (to bring Rāma back) is asserted, but dharma still demands truthfulness and principled speech.
Jābāli explains that his earlier counsel was tactical—meant to make Rāma return and to appease him—closing the sarga’s argumentative arc.
Conciliation (prasādana) as a counselor’s tool, though it implicitly invites scrutiny about ethical consistency.