Shloka 35
Adhyaya 22 — Kuvalayashva’s Death through Daitya-Deceit and Madalasa’s Self-Immolation
ताः शोच्या या वियोगिन्यो न शोच्या या मृताः सह ।
भर्त्रा वियोगस्त्वनया नानुभूतः कृतज्ञया ॥
tāḥ śocyā yā viyoginyo na śocyā yā mṛtāḥ saha |
bhartrā viyogas tv anayā nānubhūtaḥ kṛtajñayā ||
বিচ্ছেদত জীয়াই থকা নাৰীসকল কৰুণীয়; স্বামীৰ সৈতে একেলগে মৃত্যু হোৱা নাৰীসকল কৰুণীয় নহয়। কিয়নো এই কৃতজ্ঞ নাৰীয়ে স্বামী-বিচ্ছেদ ভোগ কৰা নাই।
{ "primaryRasa": "karuna", "secondaryRasa": "dharma", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
FAQs
The passage reframes ‘pitiability’ as tied to ongoing worldly deprivation (continued separation), while construing death-with as completion of a vow and an expression of kṛtajñatā.
Didactic ethics (ācāra) within story; not pañcalakṣaṇa.
‘Not experiencing separation’ can symbolize non-duality of commitment—when the inner principle (dharma/īṣṭa) is held as inseparable, existential ‘viyoga’ is overcome.