HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 10Shloka 32
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Vibhuti Yoga, Shloka 32

Vibhuti Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 32 illustration

सर्गाणामादिरन्तश्च मध्यं चैवाहमर्जुन । अध्यात्मविद्या विद्यानां वादः प्रवदतामहम् ॥ १०.३२ ॥

sargāṇām ādir antaś ca madhyaṃ caivāham arjuna | adhyātmavidyā vidyānāṃ vādaḥ pravadatām aham || 10.32 ||

Of creations I am the beginning, the end, and also the middle, O Arjuna. Of knowledges I am the knowledge of the Self; among those who debate, I am true discourse.

Of creations I am the beginning, the end, and also the middle, O Arjuna. Of sciences I am the knowledge of the Self; among disputants I am fair debate.

Of emanations/creations I am the beginning, end, and middle. Among kinds of knowledge I am adhyātma-vidyā (knowledge concerning the self/spirit); among speakers I am vāda (reasoned discussion).

vāda is often contrasted with jalpa and vitaṇḍā in classical Indian logic: it suggests truth-oriented, rule-governed dialogue rather than eristic contention. adhyātma-vidyā may be rendered ‘spiritual psychology’ or ‘metaphysics of the self’ depending on framework.

सर्गाणाम्of creations; of emanations
सर्गाणाम्:
Rootसर्ग
आदिःthe beginning; origin
आदिः:
Karta
Rootआदि
अन्तःthe end; termination
अन्तः:
Karta
Rootअन्त
and
:
Root
मध्यम्the middle; the interval
मध्यम्:
Karta
Rootमध्य
and
:
Root
एवindeed; alone; precisely
एव:
Rootएव
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
अर्जुनO Arjuna
अर्जुन:
Rootअर्जुन
अध्यात्मविद्याthe knowledge of the Self (spiritual knowledge)
अध्यात्मविद्या:
Karta
Rootअध्यात्मविद्या
विद्यानाम्among knowledges; of sciences
विद्यानाम्:
Rootविद्या
वादःdebate; discourse (argument)
वादः:
Karta
Rootवाद
प्रवदताम्of those who speak; of speakers
प्रवदताम्:
Rootप्र√वद्
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
KrishnaArjuna
VibhutiSelf-knowledge (adhyātma-vidyā)CosmologyEpistemic virtue
Divine as totality of processPrimacy of self-knowledgeEthics of discourse

FAQs

Placing self-knowledge above other knowledges highlights introspection as foundational for coherent action and well-being; vāda models constructive communication.

The divine is identified with the full arc of manifestation—origin, duration, and dissolution—suggesting a non-dual or panentheistic framing depending on interpretation.

This verse shifts from mythic exemplars to intellectual virtues, aligning the Vibhūti list with philosophical culture (adhyātma inquiry and disciplined debate).

It supports dialogue norms: argue to clarify truth, not to win; and treat reflective self-study as a central ‘discipline’ alongside external expertise.