HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 69
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Sankhya Yoga, Shloka 69

Sankhya Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 69 illustration

या निशा सर्वभूतानां तस्यां जागर्ति संयमी । यस्यां जाग्रति भूतानि सा निशा पश्यतो मुनेः ॥ २.६९ ॥

yā niśā sarvabhūtānāṁ tasyāṁ jāgarti saṁyamī | yasyāṁ jāgrati bhūtāni sā niśā paśyato muneḥ || 2.69 ||

That which is night to all beings, in that the self-controlled one is awake; and that in which beings are awake, that is night to the seeing sage.

That which is night to all beings, in that the self-controlled one is awake; that in which beings are awake, that is night to the seeing sage.

What is ‘night’ for all creatures—there the disciplined one is awake; where creatures are awake—that is ‘night’ for the sage who sees.

‘Night/awake’ is metaphorical: ordinary priorities (sense-life) are ‘wakefulness’ for many, while contemplative insight is ‘wakefulness’ for the sage; the verse contrasts orientations, not literal sleep.

याwhich (that)
या:
Rootयद्
निशाnight
निशा:
Rootनिशा
सर्वभूतानाम्of all beings
सर्वभूतानाम्:
Rootसर्वभूत
तस्याम्in that (night/state)
तस्याम्:
Adhikarana
Rootतद्
जागर्तिis awake
जागर्ति:
Root√जागृ
संयमीthe self-controlled one
संयमी:
Karta
Rootसंयमिन्
यस्याम्in which (state)
यस्याम्:
Adhikarana
Rootयद्
जाग्रतिis awake
जाग्रति:
Root√जागृ
भूतानिbeings
भूतानि:
Karta
Rootभूत
साthat (same)
सा:
Rootतद्
निशाnight
निशा:
Rootनिशा
पश्यतःof the seeing (one)
पश्यतः:
Root√पश्
मुनेःof the sage
मुनेः:
Rootमुनि
Krishna
SaṁyamaViveka (discernment)Loka-vyavahāra vs yogic vision
Reversal of valuesSpiritual vigilanceContrast between worldly and contemplative life

FAQs

It highlights that attention and value-salience differ by training: what most find compelling may lose its pull for a disciplined practitioner, and vice versa.

The ‘seeing sage’ is oriented toward the enduring (ātman/brahman framework in later verses), while ordinary beings remain oriented toward changing phenomena.

It elaborates traits of the sthitaprajña (steady in wisdom), emphasizing a radically different inner orientation.

It can describe divergent life-choices: investing in contemplation, ethics, and long-term meaning may appear ‘invisible’ to mainstream incentives focused on consumption and status.