HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 8
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 8

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 8 illustration

दुःखमित्येव यत्कर्म कायक्लेशभयात्त्यजेत् । स कृत्वा राजसं त्यागं नैव त्यागफलं लभेत् ॥ १८.८ ॥

duḥkham ityeva yat karma kāya-kleśa-bhayāt tyajet | sa kṛtvā rājasaṃ tyāgaṃ naiva tyāga-phalaṃ labhet || 18.8 ||

He who abandons action, saying, ‘It is suffering,’ out of fear of bodily hardship—having thus made rajasic renunciation—does not attain the fruit of renunciation.

जो मनुष्य कर्म को दुःखरूप समझकर केवल शारीरिक कष्ट के भय से उसका त्याग करता है, वह राजस त्याग करके त्याग का फल नहीं पाता।

If one abandons an action merely thinking, “it is painful,” out of fear of bodily hardship, having performed a rājasa (passion-driven) renunciation, one does not obtain the fruit of renunciation.

Traditional renderings emphasize ‘fear of bodily trouble’ as a taming of duty by comfort-seeking; academic-literal versions foreground the evaluative motive (“painful”) and classify it explicitly as rājasa-tyāga. No major variant is implied here beyond normal sandhi/orthography.

दुःखम्pain, suffering (as an object)
दुःखम्:
Karma
Rootदुःख
इतिthus, thinking/quoting ‘…’
इति:
Rootइति
एवindeed, just, only
एव:
Rootएव
यत्which
यत्:
Rootयद्
कर्मaction, duty-work
कर्म:
Karma
Rootकर्मन्
कायof the body
काय:
Rootकाय
क्लेशof strain, hardship
क्लेश:
Rootक्लेश
भयात्from fear (because of fear)
भयात्:
Apadana
Rootभय
त्यजेत्should abandon, would give up
त्यजेत्:
Root√त्यज्
सःhe
सः:
Karta
Rootतद्
कृत्वाhaving done (having performed)
कृत्वा:
Root√कृ
राजसम्rajasic (dominated by rajas)
राजसम्:
Rootराजस
त्यागम्renunciation, abandonment
त्यागम्:
Karma
Rootत्याग
not
:
Root
एवindeed, at all
एव:
Rootएव
त्यागof renunciation
त्याग:
Rootत्याग
फलम्fruit, result
फलम्:
Karma
Rootफल
लभेत्would obtain, should get
लभेत्:
Root√लभ्
KrishnaArjuna
KarmaTyāga (renunciation)Guṇa theory (rajas)Dharma (duty)
Motivation behind renunciationEthics of actionDiscipline versus avoidance

FAQs

The verse distinguishes principled letting-go from avoidance: giving up duties because they feel unpleasant or taxing is framed as an affect-driven response (fear of strain), not a mature regulation of desire and attachment.

Renunciation is evaluated by inner disposition rather than mere external non-performance; the guṇa framework implies that the quality of mind (rajas here) shapes the spiritual efficacy of one’s ‘tyāga’.

Within the chapter’s taxonomy of renunciation, this verse defines the rājasa type, preparing for the sattvic model that follows (18.9–10).

It cautions against quitting responsibilities solely due to discomfort; instead, it encourages examining whether withdrawal is value-based or primarily driven by aversion to effort.