HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 1
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 1

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 1 illustration

अर्जुन उवाच । संन्यासस्य महाबाहो तत्त्वमिच्छामि वेदितुम् त्यागस्य च हृषीकेश पृथक्केशिनिषूदन ॥ १८.१ ॥

arjuna uvāca | saṃnyāsasya mahābāho tattvam icchāmi veditum | tyāgasya ca hṛṣīkeśa pṛthak keśiniṣūdana || 18.1 ||

Arjuna said: O mighty-armed one, I wish to know the true nature of sannyāsa, and also of tyāga, O Hṛṣīkeśa—O slayer of Keśin—distinctly.

अर्जुन ने कहा— हे महाबाहो! मैं संन्यास का तत्त्व जानना चाहता हूँ और हे हृषीकेश! त्याग का भी (तत्त्व) अलग-अलग जानना चाहता हूँ, हे केशिनिषूदन!

Arjuna said: I wish to know the true nature of renunciation (saṃnyāsa), O strong-armed one, and also of relinquishment (tyāga), separately, O Hṛṣīkeśa, slayer of Keśin.

The verse distinguishes two near-synonyms—saṃnyāsa and tyāga—prompting a technical clarification. Epithets like ‘slayer of Keśin’ are conventional heroic titles and need not be read as foregrounding violence in this philosophical query.

अर्जुनःArjuna
अर्जुनः:
Karta
Rootअर्जुन
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
Root√वच्
संन्यासस्यof renunciation (sannyāsa)
संन्यासस्य:
Rootसंन्यास
महाबाहोO mighty-armed one
महाबाहो:
Rootमहाबाहु
तत्त्वम्the true principle; the real nature
तत्त्वम्:
Karma
Rootतत्त्व
इच्छामिI desire
इच्छामि:
Root√इष् (इच्छ्)
वेदितुम्to know
वेदितुम्:
Root√विद्
त्यागस्यof relinquishment (tyāga)
त्यागस्य:
Rootत्याग
and
:
Root
हृषीकेशO Hṛṣīkeśa (Lord of the senses)
हृषीकेश:
Rootहृषीकेश
पृथक्separately; distinctly
पृथक्:
Rootपृथक्
केशिनिषूदनO slayer of Keśin
केशिनिषूदन:
Rootकेशिनिषूदन
Arjuna
SaṃnyāsaTyāgaKarmaDharma
Conceptual clarificationRenunciation vs relinquishmentTransition to concluding synthesis

FAQs

Arjuna’s request reflects a need to resolve inner conflict about commitment and withdrawal: whether freedom is achieved by stopping action or by changing one’s relationship to action.

The question sets up a distinction between external renunciation (a social-ritual status) and internal relinquishment (non-appropriation of results), which later connects to selfhood and agency.

As the opening of the final chapter, it frames the concluding teachings by asking for precise definitions of two pivotal terms used throughout the Gītā.

It maps onto contemporary dilemmas about work and meaning: whether well-being comes from quitting responsibilities or from acting without obsessive attachment to outcomes.