HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 12Shloka 1
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Bhakti Yoga, Shloka 1

Bhakti Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 1 illustration

अर्जुन उवाच । एवं सततयुक्ता ये भक्तास्त्वां पर्युपासते । ये चाप्यक्षरमव्यक्तं तेषां के योगवित्तमाः ॥ १२.१ ॥

arjuna uvāca | evaṁ satatayuktā ye bhaktās tvāṁ paryupāsate | ye cāpy akṣaram avyaktaṁ teṣāṁ ke yogavittamāḥ || 12.1 ||

Arjuna said: Those devotees who, ever steadfast, worship You, and those who worship the imperishable unmanifest—who among them are the best knowers of yoga?

Arjuna said: Those devotees who, ever steadfast, worship You, and those who worship the imperishable unmanifest—who among them are the best knowers of yoga?

Arjuna said: Those devotees who, thus continually disciplined, revere you; and those who (revere) the imperishable, the unmanifest—who of these are the most knowledgeable in yoga?

The verse introduces a comparative framework between personal theism (saguṇa/with form, implied) and the imperishable unmanifest (nirguṇa/without manifest attributes, in later interpretive vocabularies). Academic translations retain the question’s neutrality without importing later sectarian hierarchies.

अर्जुनःArjuna
अर्जुनः:
Karta
Rootअर्जुन
उवाचsaid
उवाच:
Root√वच्
एवम्thus; in this manner
एवम्:
Rootएवम्
सततयुक्ताःconstantly united (in yoga); ever steadfast
सततयुक्ताः:
Karta
Rootसतत-युक्त
येwho (those who)
ये:
Karta
Rootयद्
भक्ताःdevotees
भक्ताः:
Karta
Rootभक्त
त्वाम्you
त्वाम्:
Karma
Rootयुष्मद्
पर्युपासतेworship; attend upon; meditate upon
पर्युपासते:
Root√उपास् (उप + आस्)
येwho (those who)
ये:
Karta
Rootयद्
and
:
Root
अपिalso; even
अपि:
Rootअपि
अक्षरम्the imperishable (reality)
अक्षरम्:
Karma
Rootअक्षर
अव्यक्तम्the unmanifest
अव्यक्तम्:
Karma
Rootअव्यक्त
तेषाम्of them
तेषाम्:
Rootतद्
केwho? which (ones)?
के:
Karta
Rootकिम्
योगवित्तमाःthe best knowers of yoga
योगवित्तमाः:
Karta
Rootयोग-वित्-तम
Arjuna
BhaktiAkṣara (imperishable)Avyakta (unmanifest)Yoga epistemology
Two orientations of practicePersonal and impersonal conceptions of ultimate realityCriteria for spiritual excellence

FAQs

The question reflects different cognitive-affective styles: devotion to a relatable focus versus contemplation of an abstract, unmanifest principle; it asks which yields steadier integration.

It raises a foundational issue in Indian philosophy: whether ultimate reality is best approached as a personal divine presence or as an imperishable, attribute-less unmanifest.

It opens Chapter 12 by directly connecting the cosmic vision’s aftermath to a practical inquiry about the most effective spiritual discipline.

It can guide contemporary practitioners to reflect on whether they benefit more from relational devotion, contemplative abstraction, or a balanced approach.