HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 45
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Arjuna Vishada Yoga, Shloka 45

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 45 illustration

यदि मामप्रतीकारमशस्त्रं शस्त्रपाणयः । धार्तराष्ट्रा रणे हन्युस्तन्मे क्षेमतरं भवेत् ॥ १.४५ ॥

yadi mām apratīkāram aśastraṃ śastrapāṇayaḥ | dhārtarāṣṭrā raṇe hanyus tan me kṣemataraṃ bhavet || 1.45 ||

यदि शस्त्रधारी धृतराष्ट्र के पुत्र मुझे निःप्रतिरोध और निःशस्त्र को रण में मार दें, तो वही मेरे लिए अधिक कल्याणकारी होगा।

If the sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra, weapons in hand, were to slay me in battle while I am unresisting and unarmed, that would be safer (better) for me.

To maintain non-graphic framing, the line can be read as Arjuna preferring personal loss over participation in perceived wrongdoing. ‘kṣematara’ carries the sense of ‘more secure/beneficial’—ethical security as much as physical.

यदिif
यदि:
Rootयदि
माम्me
माम्:
Karma
Rootअस्मद्
अप्रतीकारम्unresisting; without counter-action/defence
अप्रतीकारम्:
Karma
Rootअप्रतीकार
अशस्त्रम्unarmed
अशस्त्रम्:
Karma
Rootअशस्त्र
शस्त्रपाणयःthose with weapons in hand; weapon-handed
शस्त्रपाणयः:
Karta
Rootशस्त्रपाणि
धार्तराष्ट्राःthe sons of Dhṛtarāṣṭra
धार्तराष्ट्राः:
Karta
Rootधार्तराष्ट्र
रणेin battle
रणे:
Adhikarana
Rootरण
हन्युःmight kill / should kill
हन्युः:
Root√हन्
तत्that (act/situation)
तत्:
Rootतद्
मेfor me / of me
मे:
Rootअस्मद्
क्षेमतरम्more beneficial; safer; better
क्षेमतरम्:
Rootक्षेमतर
भवेत्would be / might be
भवेत्:
Root√भू
Arjuna
Ahimsa (as impulse, not formal doctrine here)Dharma-conflictSelf-sacrifice (ethical preference)
Refusal to participateEthical risk vs personal riskDespair

FAQs

This expresses avoidance and self-negation: Arjuna views withdrawal—even at great personal cost—as preferable to acting against his conscience.

Not primarily metaphysical; it dramatizes an ethical calculus where moral integrity is valued above survival or victory.

It intensifies Arjuna’s collapse of will, setting up the narrative moment where he lays down his weapons.

It can be read as the dilemma of choosing non-participation in systems one believes are unjust, even when that choice carries personal consequences.