HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 44
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Arjuna Vishada Yoga, Shloka 44

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 44 illustration

अहो बत महत्पापं कर्तुं व्यवसिता वयम् । यद्राज्यसुखलोभेन हन्तुं स्वजनमुद्यताः ॥ १.४४ ॥

aho bata mahat pāpaṃ kartuṃ vyavasitā vayam | yad rājyasukhallobhena hantuṃ svajanam udyatāḥ || 1.44 ||

हाय! हम तो बड़ा पाप करने को उद्यत हो गए हैं, जो राज्य और सुख के लोभ से अपने ही स्वजनों का संहार करने के लिए तैयार हैं।

Alas, we are resolved to commit a great wrong, since, out of desire for the pleasures of sovereignty, we are prepared to strike down our own people.

Many traditional translations use explicitly moral-religious language (‘pāpa’ as ‘sin’); academic renderings may translate ‘pāpa’ as ‘grave wrongdoing’ to preserve ethical force without importing later doctrinal connotations.

अहोalas! / oh!
अहो:
Rootअहो
बतindeed / surely (an exclamation)
बत:
Rootबत
महत्great
महत्:
Rootमहत्
पापम्sin / grievous wrong
पापम्:
Karma
Rootपाप
कर्तुम्to do / to commit
कर्तुम्:
Root√कृ
व्यवसिताःresolved / determined
व्यवसिताः:
Root√वस् (व्यव-√सो/√वस्)
वयम्we
वयम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
यत्since / because
यत्:
Rootयद्
राज्यof kingdom / sovereignty
राज्य:
Rootराज्य
सुखof pleasure / happiness
सुख:
Rootसुख
लोभेनby greed / through covetousness
लोभेन:
Karana
Rootलोभ
हन्तुम्to kill
हन्तुम्:
Root√हन्
स्वजनम्one's own people / kinsmen
स्वजनम्:
Karma
Rootस्वजन
उद्यताःready / raised (to act)
उद्यताः:
Root√यत् (उद्-√यत्)
Arjuna
DharmaLobha (greed)Moral injury (ethical self-assessment)
Conscience and remorseCritique of ambitionInner conflict

FAQs

Arjuna’s language shows acute moral distress: he interprets participation as a betrayal of core values, attributing the impulse to ‘greed for power and comfort.’

The verse is primarily ethical rather than metaphysical, contrasting desire-driven motivation with a higher standard of right action.

It marks a turn from social-ritual consequences to personal culpability: Arjuna now condemns his own side’s intention.

It can function as a critique of decisions driven by status, control, or comfort when they compromise relationships and ethical commitments.