HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 40
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Arjuna Vishada Yoga, Shloka 40

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 40 illustration

अधर्माभिभवात्कृष्ण प्रदुष्यन्ति कुलस्त्रियः । स्त्रीषु दुष्टासु वार्ष्णेय जायते वर्णसङ्करः ॥ १.४० ॥

adharmābhibhavāt kṛṣṇa praduṣyanti kula-striyaḥ | strīṣu duṣṭāsu vārṣṇeya jāyate varṇa-saṅkaraḥ || 1.40 ||

When adharma prevails, O Kṛṣṇa, the women of the family become corrupted; when women are corrupted, O Vārṣṇeya, varṇa-saṅkara (confusion of social order) arises.

When adharma prevails, O Kṛṣṇa, the women of the family are corrupted; when women are corrupted, O Vārṣṇeya, social intermixture (varṇa-saṅkara) arises.

From the ascendancy of adharma, O Kṛṣṇa, the women of the lineage become morally compromised; when women are compromised, O Vārṣṇeya, varṇa-saṅkara (confusion/intermixture of social orders) comes to be.

This reflects ancient social anxieties about lineage, inheritance, and ritual continuity, expressed through gendered idiom typical of the period. ‘Varṇa-saṅkara’ is debated: it may denote disruption of customary social roles and responsibilities, not merely biological ‘mixing’.

अधर्मfrom unrighteousness
अधर्म:
Apadana
Rootअधर्म
अभिभवात्from the overpowering (prevalence)
अभिभवात्:
Apadana
Rootअभिभव
कृष्णO Krishna
कृष्ण:
Rootकृष्ण
प्रदुष्यन्तिbecome corrupted / are tainted
प्रदुष्यन्ति:
Root√दुष्
कुलfamily, lineage
कुल:
Rootकुल
स्त्रियःwomen
स्त्रियः:
Karta
Rootस्त्री
स्त्रीषुamong women / in women
स्त्रीषु:
Adhikarana
Rootस्त्री
दुष्टासुwhen (they are) corrupted
दुष्टासु:
Adhikarana
Rootदुष्ट
वार्ष्णेयO descendant of Vrishni
वार्ष्णेय:
Rootवार्ष्णेय
जायतेarises / is born
जायते:
Root√जन्
वर्णsocial class / varna
वर्ण:
Rootवर्ण
सङ्करःintermixture, confusion
सङ्करः:
Karta
Rootसङ्कर
Arjuna
Dharma/AdharmaSocial order (varṇa)Kula (lineage)Anxiety about norm transmission
Social consequences of disorderLineage and cultural continuityHistorically situated gender norms

FAQs

Arjuna projects cascading consequences: when core norms erode, he anticipates broader social instability. Such ‘domino reasoning’ is common in crisis states and can intensify moral inhibition.

The verse treats dharma as a stabilizing structure for society. Later Gītā teaching will shift emphasis toward inner discipline and universal duty, which can be read as transcending purely lineage-based concerns.

Arjuna argues that widespread conflict threatens household integrity and the transmission of social and ritual responsibilities, using the idiom of his historical milieu.

Modern readers may interpret ‘varṇa-saṅkara’ more broadly as role confusion and breakdown of shared responsibilities; the verse can prompt discussion on how social stressors disproportionately burden vulnerable groups and destabilize institutions.