HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 1Shloka 34
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Arjuna Vishada Yoga, Shloka 34

Arjuna Vishada Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 34 illustration

आचार्या: पितर: पुत्रास्तथैव च पितामहा: | मातुला: श्वशुरा: पौत्रा: श्याला: सम्बन्धिनस्तथा॥ १.३४ ॥

ācāryāḥ pitaraḥ putrās tathaiva ca pitāmahāḥ | mātulāḥ śvaśurāḥ pautrāḥ śyālāḥ sambandhinas tathā || 1.34 ||

Teachers, fathers, sons, and likewise grandfathers; maternal uncles, fathers-in-law, grandsons, brothers-in-law, and other relatives—(all are here).

Teachers, fathers, sons, grandfathers, maternal uncles, fathers-in-law, grandsons, brothers-in-law, and other relatives (are here).

Teachers, fathers, sons, and likewise grandfathers; maternal uncles, fathers-in-law, grandsons, brothers-in-law, and also other relations.

This catalog functions rhetorically to expand the circle of concern from immediate family to the wider kinship network, underscoring the social fabric implicated in the conflict.

आचार्याःteachers (preceptors)
आचार्याः:
Karta
Rootआचार्य
पितरःfathers
पितरः:
Karta
Rootपितृ
पुत्राःsons
पुत्राः:
Karta
Rootपुत्र
तथाlikewise; also
तथा:
Rootतथा
एवindeed; just; even
एव:
Rootएव
and
:
Root
पितामहाःgrandfathers
पितामहाः:
Karta
Rootपितामह
मातुलाःmaternal uncles
मातुलाः:
Karta
Rootमातुल
श्वशुराःfathers-in-law
श्वशुराः:
Karta
Rootश्वशुर
पौत्राःgrandsons
पौत्राः:
Karta
Rootपौत्र
श्यालाःbrothers-in-law (wife’s brothers)
श्यालाः:
Karta
Rootश्याल
सम्बन्धिनःrelatives; kinsmen
सम्बन्धिनः:
Karta
Rootसम्बन्धिन्
तथाlikewise; also
तथा:
Rootतथा
Arjuna
Kula (family lineage)Social order (varṇa-āśrama context)Dharma as relational duty
Web of obligationsSanctity of teacher-student bondSocial cohesion

FAQs

Enumerating relations externalizes Arjuna’s inner conflict: naming roles (teacher, father, etc.) activates layered loyalties and intensifies his reluctance.

The verse highlights dharma as embedded in social roles; later teaching will distinguish role-based duty from attachment-driven identification.

Arjuna points out that the opposing side includes figures traditionally owed reverence and care, complicating any simple notion of righteous action.

It illustrates how ethical decisions often involve multiple role obligations (to mentors, parents, dependents), requiring careful discernment rather than single-metric thinking.