Shloka 35
The Greatness of Puruṣottama
Goloka-tattva and Rādhā–Kṛṣṇa Upāsanā
कृष्णो वा मूलप्रकृतिः शिवो वा राधिका स्वयम् । एवं वा मिथुनं वापि न केनापीति निश्चितम् ॥ ३५ ॥
kṛṣṇo vā mūlaprakṛtiḥ śivo vā rādhikā svayam | evaṃ vā mithunaṃ vāpi na kenāpīti niścitam || 35 ||
无论说奎师那是本源的根本自性（原初的普拉克里蒂），或说湿婆是；无论说罗陀迦自身即是那至上原理；或说正是这对神圣双侣——这一切都无人能作定论。
Narada (dialogue context traditionally placed within Narada–Sanatkumara discourse; exact speaker not explicit in the single-verse excerpt)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: adbhuta
FAQs
It emphasizes the limits of dogmatic certainty about the supreme principle and points the reader toward humility in metaphysical claims, allowing devotion to transcend rigid sectarian definitions.
By acknowledging that ultimate identity (Kṛṣṇa/Śiva/Rādhikā/Prakṛti) is not decisively fixed by debate, it implicitly prioritizes sincere worship and lived devotion over argumentative finality.
No specific Vedāṅga procedure is taught in this verse; the key takeaway is philosophical discernment (tattva-vicāra) and careful use of language—aligned with Vyākaraṇa-style precision in defining terms like prakṛti and niścaya.