Shloka 37
आपद्धर्मे वैश्यवृत्तिः, विक्रय-निषेधाः, तथा ब्रह्म-क्षत्र-सम्बन्धः
Emergency Livelihood, Prohibited Trade, and Brahman–Kshatra Regulation
कार्य कुर्यान्न वा कुर्यात् संवार्यो वा भवेन्न वा । तस्माच्छस्त्रं ग्रहीतव्यमन्यत्र क्षत्रबन्धुत:
kāryaṁ kuryān na vā kuryāt saṁvāryo vā bhaven na vā | tasmāc chastraṁ grahītavyam anyatra kṣatrabandhutaḥ ||
尤狄湿提罗说：“当行乎，抑当止乎？当禁乎，抑不当禁乎？故此——除却那‘刹帝利之亲’（kṣatrabandhu，徒有刹帝利之名者）——执持兵刃当被承认为必要之举。若盗贼滋蔓、秩序崩坏，而护民之策又不可得，则纵非刹帝利之属，亦可正当地荷兵卫法，保全社群。”
युधिछिर उवाच
Educational Q&A
In crisis conditions where public safety and dharma are threatened, the ethical priority becomes protection of society; taking up arms can be justified beyond strict varṇa-role boundaries, while those who are kṣatriya only in name (kṣatrabandhu) are excluded from being treated as proper agents of righteous force.
Yudhiṣṭhira questions Bhīṣma about governance and emergency ethics: if banditry grows and social disorder spreads, can a strong brāhmaṇa, vaiśya, or śūdra wield punitive force to protect people when kṣatriyas fail? This verse frames the dilemma—act or refrain, restrain or allow—and leans toward permitting arms for protection in exceptional circumstances.