Puruṣaikatva-vyākhyāna: The One Virāṭ Puruṣa and the Many ‘Puruṣas’
Rudra–Brahmā Saṃvāda
छागेनाजेन यष्टव्यमेवमुक्तं वचस्तदा । भीष्मजी कहते हैं--राजन्! देवताओंका मत जानकर राजा वसुने उन्हींका पक्ष लेकर कह दिया कि अजका अर्थ है, छाग (बकरा); अतः उसीके द्वारा यज्ञ करना चाहिये ।।
chāgenājena yaṣṭavyam evam uktaṁ vacas tadā | kupitās te tataḥ sarve munayaḥ sūryavarcasaḥ ||
毗湿摩说道:当时有人断言:“祭祀确当以阇伽(chāga,山羊)为牲,因为‘阿阇’(aja)之义即为山羊。”婆苏王既站在诸天一边,又宣示此种解释,便依此而言。于是那些光辉如日的仙圣尽皆震怒。
भीष्म उवाच
The passage highlights how dharma in ritual practice can hinge on interpretation of authoritative words: a single term (“aja”) may be read differently, and choosing an interpretation—especially by aligning with one authority (the gods) against another (the sages)—can carry ethical and social consequences.
In Bhishma’s account, King Vasu, after learning the gods’ view, declares that “aja” should be understood as “chāga” (goat) and that the sacrifice should be performed accordingly. This pronouncement provokes the sun-bright sages, who become angry, setting up a conflict over ritual meaning and authority.