Shloka 15
Sabhā Parva, Adhyāya 68 — Pāṇḍavānāṃ Vanavāsa-prasthānaḥ; Duḥśāsana-nindā; Pāṇḍava-pratijñāḥ
“हम सबके आचार्य भरद्वाजनन्दन द्रोणाचार्य और कृपाचार्य ये दोनों ब्राह्मणकुलके श्रेष्ठ पुरुष हैं। ये दोनों भी इस प्रश्नपर अपने विचार क्यों नहीं प्रकट करते? ।।
vaiśampāyana uvāca |
asmākaṁ sarveṣām ācāryau bharadvājanandana-droṇācāryaḥ kṛpācāryaś ca—etau dvau brāhmaṇakulasyottamau puruṣau | etāv api kasmād asmin praśne svamatam na prakāśayataḥ ||
ye tv anye pṛthivīpālāḥ sametāḥ sarvato diśaḥ | kāma-krodhau samutsṛjya te bruvantu yathāmati ||
毗湿摩波耶那说道：“我们的师长——婆罗堕阇之子德罗纳与克利帕——皆为婆罗门族中最卓越者。为何连他们也不就此问宣示裁断？其余自四方云集于此的诸王，当摒弃欲与怒，各依其所知，就此事发言。”
वैशम्पायन उवाच
Educational Q&A
A judgment on a contentious issue should be offered without being driven by kāma (self-interested desire) or krodha (anger). The verse frames ethical deliberation as requiring restraint and impartiality, especially in a public assembly.
In the royal assembly, the speaker points out that eminent teachers Droṇa and Kṛpa have not voiced their view on the question at hand, and then calls upon the other assembled kings—arrived from all directions—to speak their opinions after abandoning personal passions.