Shloka 2
Saubhadra under Concentrated Assault; Pārṣata’s Intervention and Escalation
दिष्टमेव परं मन्ये पौरुषादिति मे मति: । यत्र शान्तनवो भीष्मो नातरद् युधि पाण्डवम्,मैं तो पुरुषार्थसे अधिक प्रबल भाग्यको ही मानता हूँ और इसीपर विश्वास करता हूँ, जिसके अनुसार शान्तनुनन्दन भीष्म युद्धमें पाण्डुपुत्र अर्जुनसे पार न पा सके
diṣṭam eva paraṃ manye pauruṣād iti me matiḥ | yatra śāntanavo bhīṣmo nātarad yudhi pāṇḍavam ||
持国王说道：“我深信唯有命运至上——强过人的努力。正因那命运之力，善檀奴之子毗湿摩在战斗中也未能压倒般度之子（阿周那）。”
धृतराष्ट उवाच
Educational Q&A
Dhṛtarāṣṭra interprets a battlefield outcome as proof that daiva (destiny) overrides pauruṣa (human effort). Ethically, the verse highlights a common tendency to attribute results to fate—sometimes to cope with painful news or to avoid confronting one’s own responsibility in the chain of events.
Dhṛtarāṣṭra reacts to reports from the Kurukṣetra war. He notes that even Bhīṣma—renowned as nearly invincible—could not ‘cross over’ or overpower the Pāṇḍava warrior (understood here as Arjuna) in combat, and he concludes that destiny must be the decisive force.