Srimad Bhagavatam — Saptama Skandha, Shloka 8
Hiraṇyakaśipu’s Wrath, the Assault on Vedic Culture, and the Boy-Yamarāja’s Teaching on the Soul
तस्य त्यक्तस्वभावस्य घृणेर्मायावनौकस: । भजन्तं भजमानस्य बालस्येवास्थिरात्मन: ॥ ७ ॥ मच्छूलभिन्नग्रीवस्य भूरिणा रुधिरेण वै । असृक्प्रियं तर्पयिष्ये भ्रातरं मे गतव्यथ: ॥ ८ ॥
tasya tyakta-svabhāvasya ghṛṇer māyā-vanaukasaḥ bhajantaṁ bhajamānasya bālasyevāsthirātmanaḥ
至尊人格首神已经放弃了他对恶魔和半神人一视同仁的本性。虽然他是至尊者，但现在受幻象（māyā）的影响，为了取悦他的信徒半神人，他化身为野猪，就像一个不安分的孩子偏向某人一样。因此，我要用我的三叉戟砍下毗湿奴的头，用他体内流出的鲜血来取悦我那嗜血的兄弟金目。这样我也就能平静下来了。
The defect of the demoniac mentality is expressed in this verse very clearly. Hiraṇyakaśipu thought that Viṣṇu also becomes partial, like a child whose mind is not steady or resolute. The Lord can change His mind at any time, Hiraṇyakaśipu thought, and therefore His words and activities are like those of children. Actually, because the demons are ordinary human beings, their minds change, and being materially conditioned, they think that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is conditioned also. As the Lord says in Bhagavad-gītā (9.11) , avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam: “Fools deride Me when I descend in a human form.”
FAQs
This verse contrasts a childish, unstable mentality (as seen in Hiraṇyakaśipu’s accusation) with the steadiness implied in true bhakti—real devotion does not flicker due to fear, pressure, or anger.
He was enraged that Prahlāda, despite being his son, remained devoted to Lord Viṣṇu; Hiraṇyakaśipu interprets Prahlāda’s unwavering worship as disloyalty and labels it childish instability.
Do not judge sincere spiritual practice through ego, politics, or family expectations; steadiness in values and devotion is a sign of maturity, not childishness.