HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 18
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 18

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 18 illustration

नैव तस्य कृतेनार्थो नाकृतेनेह कश्चन । न चास्य सर्वभूतेषु कश्चिदर्थव्यपाश्रयः ॥ ३.१८ ॥

naiva tasya kṛtenārtho nākṛteneha kaścana | na cāsya sarva-bhūteṣu kaścid artha-vyapāśrayaḥ || 3.18 ||

对他而言,所作之事并无所得;不作之事亦无所失。在一切众生之中,他也不为任何目的而依赖任何人。

For him there is no gain from what is done, nor any loss from what is not done; nor does he depend on any being for any purpose.

For him there is no purpose served by what is done, nor any by what is left undone; and among all beings he has no dependence for any end.

Traditional and academic translations are close. The main interpretive question is scope: whether this describes the liberated sage’s non-instrumental relation to action (no personal ‘need’), not a blanket rejection of compassionate or exemplary action.

not
:
Root
एवindeed/just
एव:
Rootएव
तस्यof him/of that (person)
तस्य:
Rootतद्
कृतेनby (what is) done; by action performed
कृतेन:
Karana
Rootकृत
अर्थःpurpose/need/benefit
अर्थः:
Karta
Rootअर्थ
not
:
Root
अकृतेनby (what is) not done; by non-performance/inaction
अकृतेन:
Karana
Rootअकृत
इहhere (in this world/context)
इह:
Rootइह
कश्चनanyone/anything whatsoever
कश्चन:
Karta
Rootकश्चन
not
:
Root
and/also
:
Root
अस्यof him/of this (person)
अस्य:
Rootइदम्
सर्वभूतेषुin all beings
सर्वभूतेषु:
Adhikarana
Rootसर्वभूत
कश्चित्any (one) at all
कश्चित्:
Karta
Rootकश्चित्
अर्थव्यपाश्रयःdependence on a purpose; reliance on any end/utility
अर्थव्यपाश्रयः:
Karta
Rootअर्थ-व्यपाश्रय
KrishnaArjuna
Mokṣa (implied)Non-instrumentality of actionAsaṅga (non-attachment)Ātman-centered fulfillment
Freedom from personal gain/loss calculusNon-dependenceRedefinition of motivation

FAQs

It describes reduced outcome-dependence: actions are not used to patch inner insecurity, lowering stress tied to success/failure.

If the self is complete, action cannot add to or subtract from it; this aligns with the Gītā’s broader claim that the deepest self is unaffected by external change.

It continues 3.17 by clarifying that the realized person’s relation to action is non-transactional, preparing the argument that such a person may still act for the world’s sake (3.20).

A useful lens for leadership and service: act without treating outcomes as personal validation, while still being responsible and responsive.