HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 3Shloka 17
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 17

Karma YogaKarma Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 17 illustration

यस्त्वात्मरतिरेव स्यादात्मतृप्तश्च मानवः । आत्मन्येव च सन्तुष्टस्तस्य कार्यं न विद्यते ॥ ३.१७ ॥

yas tv ātma-ratir eva syād ātma-tṛptaś ca mānavaḥ | ātmany eva ca santuṣṭas tasya kāryaṁ na vidyate || 3.17 ||

然而,若有人唯以自我(Ātman)为乐,以自我为满足,并安住于自我之中而知足——此人无所当作。

But the person who rejoices in the Self alone, is satisfied with the Self, and is content in the Self—he has no duty to perform.

For the human being who delights only in the self, is fulfilled by the self, and is content in the self, there is no obligatory task.

Traditional commentators often restrict this to the realized knower (jñānī) for whom social obligation no longer binds. Academic readings note the rhetorical function: Krishna distinguishes ordinary agents (who must follow the ‘cycle’) from the rare ideal of self-sufficiency, while still later recommending action for exemplarity (3.20–21).

यःwho (he who)
यः:
Karta
Rootयद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
तुbut, however
तु:
Rootतु
आत्मरति:one whose delight is in the Self
आत्मरति::
Karta
Rootआत्मरति (प्रातिपदिक)
एवalone, indeed
एव:
Rootएव
स्यात्should be, would be
स्यात्:
Root√अस् (भू/अस्)
आत्मतृप्त:satisfied in the Self
आत्मतृप्त::
Karta
Rootआत्मतृप्त (प्रातिपदिक)
and
:
Root
मानवःthe man, the human being
मानवः:
Karta
Rootमानव (प्रातिपदिक)
आत्मनिin the Self
आत्मनि:
Adhikarana
Rootआत्मन् (प्रातिपदिक)
एवalone, indeed
एव:
Rootएव
and
:
Root
सन्तुष्टःcontent, fully satisfied
सन्तुष्टः:
Karta
Root√तुष् (सन्तुष्ट = सम्+√तुष्, क्त)
तस्यof him, for him
तस्य:
Rootतद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
कार्यम्duty to be done, obligatory action
कार्यम्:
Karta
Rootकार्य (प्रातिपदिक)
not
:
Root
विद्यतेexists, is found
विद्यते:
Root√विद् (विद्/विन्द्)
KrishnaArjuna
ĀtmanSelf-sufficiency (ātma-tṛpti)Niṣkāma karma (background contrast)Liberation-ethics relation
Ideal of inner fulfillmentLimits of obligationDistinction between realized and ordinary agency

FAQs

It depicts a stable well-being not dependent on external rewards, suggesting an advanced form of intrinsic satisfaction and reduced reactivity.

The ‘Self’ here functions as the locus of completeness: when fulfillment is grounded in ātman, action is no longer driven by lack or desire.

Krishna anticipates an objection—if knowledge frees, why act?—and answers by describing the exceptional case of the fully contented person.

It can be read as a model of psychological autonomy: cultivate inner stability so that duties are performed from clarity rather than compulsion.