निबद्धं वादमुत्सृज्यान्यं वादं संक्रामति पूर्वोक्तं पश्चिमेनार्थेन नाभिसंधत्ते परवाक्यमनभिग्राह्यमभिग्राह्यावतिष्ठते प्रतिज्ञाय देशं निर्दिशेत्युक्ते न निर्दिशति हीनदेशमदेशं वा निर्दिशति निर्दिष्टाद्देशादन्यं देशमुपस्थापयति उपस्थिते देशेऽर्थवचनं नैवमित्यपव्ययते साक्षिभिरवधृतं नेच्छति असम्भाष्ये देशे साक्षिभिर्मिथः सम्भाषते इति परोक्तहेतवः ॥ कZ_०३.१.१९ ॥
nibaddhaṃ vādam utsṛjyānyaṃ vādaṃ saṃkrāmati pūrvoktaṃ paścimenārthena nābhisaṃdhatte paravākyam anabhigrāhyam abhigrāhyāvatiṣṭhate pratijñāya deśaṃ nirdiśety ukte na nirdiśati hīnadeśam adeśaṃ vā nirdiśati nirdiṣṭād deśād anyaṃ deśam upasthāpayati upasthite deśe'rthavacanaṃ naivam ity apavyayate sākṣibhir avadhṛtaṃ necchati asambhāṣye deśe sākṣibhirmithaḥ sambhāṣate iti paroktahetavaḥ ||
以下为对方所称之理由(显示其回避/瑕疵):放弃已提出的案件而转向另一案;未能将先前所述与后来的含义相衔接;执着于不可采纳之事,或拒绝可采纳之事;被要求指明与请求有关之地点而不指明,或指明低劣/无关之地;提出与既已指明之地不同的地点;地点既定后又以“并非如此”否认实体;拒绝证人已确立之事实;以及在禁止此类接触之处与证人私下交谈。
Procedural sabotage—shifting claims, exploiting admissibility confusion, manipulating venue facts, and influencing witnesses—so that adjudication is delayed or distorted.
It treats private conversation with witnesses in prohibited settings as a procedural red flag, enabling sanctions or adverse inference.