Previous Verse
Next Verse

Agni Purana — Yoga & Brahma-vidya, Shloka 22

Adhyāya 379 — अद्वैतब्रह्मविज्ञानम्

Advaita-brahma-vijñāna

रजोवाच यो ऽस्ति सोहमिति ब्रह्मन् कथं वक्तुं न शक्यते आत्मन्येषु न दोषाय शब्दोहमिति यो द्विज

rajovāca yo 'sti sohamiti brahman kathaṃ vaktuṃ na śakyate ātmanyeṣu na doṣāya śabdohamiti yo dvija

罗阇斯说道:“婆罗门啊,怎会不能说出‘我即彼(so’ham)’?对于安住于自性者,‘我’这一语并非过失——噢,二次生者。”

रजः-उवाचRajas said
रजः-उवाच:
Kriya (क्रिया/Reporting verb)
TypeVerb
Rootरजस् (प्रातिपदिक) + वच् (धातु)
Formउवाच—लिट्-लकार (Perfect), परस्मैपद, प्रथम-पुरुष, एकवचन; कर्ता—रजः (प्रथमा एकवचन)
यःwho/that which
यः:
Karta (कर्ता/Subject of asti)
TypeNoun
Rootयद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन; सम्बन्ध-प्रश्न/यत्-प्रत्यय (relative pronoun)
अस्तिis/exists
अस्ति:
Kriya (क्रिया)
TypeVerb
Rootअस् (धातु)
Formलट्-लकार, परस्मैपद, प्रथम-पुरुष, एकवचन
सःhe/that
सः:
Karta (कर्ता/Correlative)
TypeNoun
Rootतद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन; सर्वनाम
अहम्I
अहम्:
Predicate (विधेय/Predicative)
TypeNoun
Rootअस्मद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formउत्तम-पुरुष-सर्वनाम, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन
इतिthus/“…”
इति:
Sambandha (सम्बन्ध/Quotation marker)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइति (अव्यय)
Formअव्यय; वाक्य-समाप्ति/उद्धरणसूचक (quotative)
ब्रह्मन्O Brahman
ब्रह्मन्:
Sambodhana (सम्बोधन/Address)
TypeNoun
Rootब्रह्मन् (प्रातिपदिक)
Formनपुंसकलिङ्ग, सम्बोधन-विभक्ति (Vocative), एकवचन
कथम्how
कथम्:
Sambandha (सम्बन्ध/Interrogative)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootकथम् (अव्यय)
Formअव्यय; प्रश्नार्थक क्रियाविशेषण (interrogative adverb)
वक्तुम्to say
वक्तुम्:
Karma (कर्म/Complement of śakyate)
TypeVerb
Rootवच् (धातु)
Formतुमुन्-प्रत्ययान्तम् (Infinitive)
not
:
Sambandha (सम्बन्ध/Negation)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootन (अव्यय)
Formअव्यय; निषेध (negation particle)
शक्यतेis possible/can be
शक्यते:
Kriya (क्रिया)
TypeVerb
Rootशक् (धातु)
Formलट्-लकार, आत्मनेपद, प्रथम-पुरुष, एकवचन; कर्मणि-प्रयोग (passive: is possible)
आत्मनिin the self
आत्मनि:
Adhikarana (अधिकरण/Location)
TypeNoun
Rootआत्मन् (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, सप्तमी-विभक्ति (7th/Locative), एकवचन
एषुin these
एषु:
Adhikarana (अधिकरण/Location)
TypeNoun
Rootएतद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग/नपुंसकलिङ्ग, सप्तमी-विभक्ति, बहुवचन; सर्वनाम (in these)
not
:
Sambandha (सम्बन्ध/Negation)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootन (अव्यय)
Formअव्यय; निषेध
दोषायfor fault/blame
दोषाय:
Sampradana (सम्प्रदान/End)
TypeNoun
Rootदोष (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, चतुर्थी-विभक्ति (4th/Dative), एकवचन
शब्दःthe word/sound
शब्दः:
Karta (कर्ता/Subject of implied asti)
TypeNoun
Rootशब्द (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन
अहम्I
अहम्:
Predicate (विधेय/Predicative)
TypeNoun
Rootअस्मद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formप्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन
इतिthus
इति:
Sambandha (सम्बन्ध)
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइति (अव्यय)
Formअव्यय; उद्धरणसूचक
यःwho
यः:
Karta (कर्ता/Subject)
TypeNoun
Rootयद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, प्रथमा-विभक्ति, एकवचन; सम्बन्ध-प्रश्न/यत्
द्विजO twice-born
द्विज:
Sambodhana (सम्बोधन)
TypeNoun
Rootद्विज (प्रातिपदिक)
Formपुंलिङ्ग, सम्बोधन-विभक्ति, एकवचन

Rajas (personified quality/guṇa, speaking in dialogue)

Vidya Category: {"primary_vidya":"Philosophy","secondary_vidya":"Mantra","practical_application":"Guides inquiry into the legitimacy of ‘so’ham’ (identity statement) and the proper use of ‘aham’ in Self-realization versus ego-assertion.","sutra_style":false}

Encyclopedic Reference: {"reference_type":"Commentary","entry_title":"Rajas’ Defense of ‘So’ham’ and the Non-fault of ‘Aham’ for the Atma-stha","lookup_keywords":["so'ham","aham-shabda","atma-stha","rajas uvaca","advaita dialogue"],"quick_summary":"Rajas argues that uttering ‘so’ham’ is not inherently impossible or दोष (fault); for one established in the Self, ‘I’ does not imply egoic error."}

Alamkara Type: Prashna (rhetorical question)

Concept: For the realized (atma-stha), ‘aham’ can function as a pointer to pure consciousness rather than ego; ‘so’ham’ is defended as a valid upadesha-vakya when properly understood.

Application: Use ‘so’ham’ as contemplative recollection (smarana) without superimposing body-mind identity; monitor whether ‘I’ is used as ego or as witnessing awareness.

Khanda Section: Advaita-vedanta / Atma-jnana (Philosophical Dialogue on Self-knowledge)

Primary Rasa: shanta

Secondary Rasa: adbhuta

Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"A philosophical dialogue: Rajas addressing a seated Brahmin teacher, gesturing as if questioning the impossibility of saying ‘so’ham’.","kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural, two figures in debate posture in a gurukula setting, palm-leaf manuscripts, one labeled ‘Rajas’ speaking, the Brahmin calm, warm ochres and greens, stylized facial features.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore painting, central seated Brahmin with gold-embossed aura, Rajas standing with respectful gesture, ‘so’ham’ inscribed on a scroll motif, ornate pillars and gold detailing.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore painting, didactic classroom scene with clear hand gestures (mudras) indicating question and explanation, minimal background, fine lines, soft colors, manuscript on a low desk.","mughal_miniature_prompt":"Mughal miniature, courtly scholarly debate in a veranda, detailed textiles, subtle expressions, calligraphic cartouche containing ‘so’ham’, refined shading and perspective."}

Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"instructional","suggested_raga":"Kalyani","pace":"medium","voice_tone":"instructional"}

Sandhi Resolution Notes: रजोवाच = रजः उवाच; योऽस्ति = यः अस्ति; सोहमिति = सः अहम् इति; शब्दोहमिति = शब्दः अहम् इति

Related Themes: Agni Purana 379.23-24 (clarification of shabda-bhranti and futility of dualistic questioning)

B
Brahman
A
Atman
S
So'ham
A
Aham (I-sense)
D
Dvija

FAQs

It teaches the jñāna-vidyā use of the mahāvākya-like contemplation “so’ham” (“I am He”) and clarifies that uttering “aham” is not spiritually blameworthy when rooted in Atman-realization.

Alongside rituals and practical sciences, the Agni Purana also preserves Advaita-style self-inquiry: it treats language, ego-notion, and identity with Brahman—showing the text’s breadth from outer rites to inner realization.

It reframes the “I”-notion: when purified by Self-knowledge, “I” points to Brahman rather than ego, supporting liberation-oriented practice (mokṣa-sādhana) rather than karmic bondage.