Bharata’s Attachment and the Palanquin Teaching on ‘I’ and ‘Mine’
जिह्वा ब्रवीत्यहमिति दंतौष्टतालुक नृप । एतेनाहं यतः सर्वे वाङ्निष्पादनहेतवः ॥ ७८ ॥
jihvā bravītyahamiti daṃtauṣṭatāluka nṛpa | etenāhaṃ yataḥ sarve vāṅniṣpādanahetavaḥ || 78 ||
“Hỡi Đại vương, lưỡi nói ‘ta (nói)’, trong khi răng, môi và vòm miệng cũng cùng hoạt động. Nhưng chính nhờ lưỡi mà cái ‘ta’ ấy được khẳng định, vì tất cả những thứ kia chỉ là các nhân duyên trợ giúp để lời nói phát sinh.”
Sanatkumara (teaching a king in Moksha-Dharma context)
Vrata: none
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: adbhuta
It critiques the ego’s claim “I do,” showing that what we call ‘I’ is often only an appropriation of actions performed through multiple instruments; this supports detachment and self-inquiry in Moksha-Dharma.
By weakening doership (ahaṁkāra), the devotee can attribute action and speech to the Lord’s power rather than the self, making prayer, japa, and kīrtana more humble and surrender-based.
It reflects Śikṣā (phonetics/articulation) and supports a Vyākaraṇa-style insight: speech arises from coordinated organs, so correct utterance and disciplined speech are both technical and spiritual practices.