Jvara-Nidāna-Lakṣaṇa: Causes, Doṣic Types, Āma/Nirāma Stages, and Prognosis of Fever
प्रायो ऽनुयाति मर्यादां मोक्षाय च वधाय च / इत्यग्निवेशस्य मतं हारीतस्य पुनः स्मृतिः
prāyo 'nuyāti maryādāṃ mokṣāya ca vadhāya ca / ityagniveśasya mataṃ hārītasya punaḥ smṛtiḥ
Nói chung, con người đi theo ranh giới đã được ấn định (maryādā—khuôn phép), điều ấy hoặc dẫn đến giải thoát (mokṣa), hoặc dẫn đến suy vong. Đó là quan điểm của Agniveśa; và lại được Smṛti của Hārīta xác chứng lần nữa.
Lord Vishnu (in discourse to Garuda)
Concept: Following prescribed maryādā (rule/limit of conduct) is decisive: it can conduce to mokṣa or to ruin; the claim is supported by Agniveśa and Hārīta-smṛti.
Vedantic Theme: Sādhana depends on niyama and śāstra-pramāṇa; right conduct purifies antaḥkaraṇa, enabling liberation, while transgression strengthens bondage.
Application: Adopt consistent disciplines (diet, cleanliness, restraint, truthful living); treat śāstra-informed boundaries as protective guardrails rather than optional advice.
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: bhayanaka
Related Themes: Garuda Purana 1.147.49 (maryādā applied to tri-doṣa and tithi); Garuda Purana 1.147.50 (consequences of aśuddhi/mithyāhāra)
This verse states that adherence to maryādā—right limits and dharmic norms—shapes one’s ultimate outcome, becoming a cause for either moksha or downfall.
It links destiny to conduct: the soul’s trajectory is determined by whether one aligns with dharmic boundaries, a principle supported by Smṛti authorities like Agniveśa and Hārīta.
Live within ethical limits—truthfulness, self-restraint, and duty—because consistent conduct is portrayed as the deciding factor between upliftment and ruin.