Shukra’s Saṃjīvanī, Shiva’s Containment of the Asuras, and Indra’s Recovery of Power
सम्भुनामासुरपतिः स ब्रह्मणमयोधयत् महौजसं कुजम्भश्च विष्णुं दैत्यान्तकारिणम्
sambhunāmāsurapatiḥ sa brahmaṇamayodhayat mahaujasaṃ kujambhaśca viṣṇuṃ daityāntakāriṇam
شمبھو نامی اسورپتی نے میدانِ جنگ میں برہما سے جنگ کی؛ اور عظیم قوت والا کُجَمبھ دَیتیہوں کے ہلاک کرنے والے وِشنو سے لڑا۔
{ "primaryRasa": "vira", "secondaryRasa": "raudra", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
No. The verse explicitly calls Sambhu an ‘asura-pati’ (Asura lord). In Purāṇic literature, identical or similar names can occur across different beings; here it is a proper name of an Asura leader, not Śiva’s epithet.
It frames Viṣṇu as the cosmic corrective force who ends Daitya aggression. Even without naming a specific avatāra, the epithet signals Viṣṇu’s recurring function: restoring balance when Daityas threaten the gods and the world-order.
This is a common Purāṇic battle technique: a ‘roster’ (yoddhā-paricaya) that maps cosmic factions by pairing champions. It emphasizes the scale of the conflict and the hierarchy of opponents (major gods matched with major Asura leaders).