पापभेदवर्णनम्
Classification of Sins / Taxonomy of Pāpa
सभृत्यपरिवारस्य पशुधान्यधनस्य च । कुप्यधान्यपशुस्तेयमपां व्यापावनं तथा
sabhṛtyaparivārasya paśudhānyadhanasya ca | kupyadhānyapaśusteyamapāṃ vyāpāvanaṃ tathā
خادموں اور خاندان سمیت کسی گھر والے کے مویشی، اناج اور مال کی چوری؛ قیمتی اشیا، غلہ اور جانور چرانا؛ اور پانی کو آلودہ یا خراب کرنا—یہ سب بھی سخت گناہ ہیں۔
Suta Goswami
Tattva Level: pasha
Shiva Form: Paśupatinātha
Sthala Purana: Not a Jyotirliṅga passage; the verse functions as a dharma-śāstric catalogue of pāpa (sin) that increases āṇava–karma–māyīya bondage, especially through harm to communal sustenance (grain, cattle) and the shared element of water.
Significance: Ethical purity (ahiṃsā, asteya, śauca) is presented as a prerequisite for Śiva-bhakti and for eligibility for tīrtha/vrata fruits; avoiding these acts is framed as removing karmic obstruction (mala) to grace.
It frames dharma as the foundation for Shaiva purification: harming others through theft or by polluting shared resources creates pāpa that binds the paśu (individual soul) more tightly in pāśa (bondage), delaying grace and liberation under Pati (Shiva).
Linga-worship emphasizes śauca (purity) and ahiṃsā in conduct; this verse highlights that devotion to Saguna Shiva is incomplete if one violates basic dharma through theft or by defiling water, which undermines the very purity expected in Shaiva worship.
A practical takeaway is ethical restraint (yama-like discipline) alongside Shiva-upāsanā—daily japa of the Pañcākṣarī (Om Namaḥ Śivāya) with a vow of non-stealing and maintaining purity of water used for ācamana and abhiṣeka.