Previous Verse
Next Verse

Shloka 12

Dāyavibhāga (Inheritance Apportionment) and Household Precedence — Dialogue of Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma

ब्राह्मणी तु भवेज्ज्येष्ठा क्षत्रिया क्षत्रियस्य तु रत्यर्थमपि शूद्रा स्यान्नेत्याहुरपरे जना:

bhīṣma uvāca | brāhmaṇī tu bhavej jyeṣṭhā kṣatriyā kṣatriyasya tu | ratyartham api śūdrā syān nety āhur apare janāḥ ||

بھیشم نے کہا—بیویوں میں برہمن کے لیے برہمنی سب سے برتر سمجھی جاتی ہے، اور کشتری کے لیے کشتریہ ہی برتر ہے۔ کچھ لوگ کہتے ہیں کہ رتی کے لیے شودرا عورت کو بھی اختیار کیا جا سکتا ہے؛ مگر دوسرے لوگ اسے قبول نہیں کرتے۔

ब्राह्मणीa Brahmin woman
ब्राह्मणी:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootब्राह्मणी
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
भवेत्would be/should be
भवेत्:
TypeVerb
Rootभू
FormOptative, 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
ज्येष्ठाthe foremost/superior
ज्येष्ठा:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootज्येष्ठ
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
क्षत्रियाa Kshatriya woman
क्षत्रिया:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootक्षत्रिया
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
क्षत्रियस्यof a Kshatriya (man)
क्षत्रियस्य:
TypeNoun
Rootक्षत्रिय
FormMasculine, Genitive, Singular
तुbut/indeed
तु:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootतु
रति-अर्थम्for the sake of sexual pleasure
रति-अर्थम्:
TypeNoun
Rootरत्यर्थ
FormMasculine, Accusative, Singular
अपिeven/also
अपि:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootअपि
शूद्राa Shudra woman
शूद्रा:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootशूद्रा
FormFeminine, Nominative, Singular
स्यात्may be/should be
स्यात्:
TypeVerb
Rootअस्
FormOptative, 3rd, Singular, Parasmaipada
not
:
TypeIndeclinable
Root
इतिthus
इति:
TypeIndeclinable
Rootइति
आहुःthey say
आहुः:
TypeVerb
Rootअह्
FormPresent, 3rd, Plural, Parasmaipada
अपरेothers
अपरे:
Karta
TypeAdjective
Rootअपर
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural
जनाःpeople
जनाः:
Karta
TypeNoun
Rootजन
FormMasculine, Nominative, Plural

भीष्म उवाच

B
Bhishma

Educational Q&A

The verse presents a normative hierarchy of preferred spouses within varṇa (Brahmin woman as foremost; for a Kshatriya, a Kshatriya woman as foremost) while also recording a disagreement: some permit a Shudra woman solely for sexual relations, whereas others reject that permissibility. The emphasis is on dharma-discourse that distinguishes between socially sanctioned marriage norms and contested, limited allowances.

In the Anushasana Parva’s instructional setting, Bhishma is giving guidance on conduct and social-religious norms. Here he reports differing opinions among authorities/people regarding acceptable marital or sexual unions across varṇa lines, indicating that the tradition contains debated positions rather than a single unanimous rule.