Jabali Bound on the Banyan Tree and Nandayanti’s Appeal at Sri-Kantha on the Yamuna
येयं गिरिसुता वीर सा माता धर्मतस्तव पिता त्रिनयनो देवः श्रूयतामत्र कारणम्
yeyaṃ girisutā vīra sā mātā dharmatastava pitā trinayano devaḥ śrūyatāmatra kāraṇam
“O mandirigma, ang Girisutā na ito, ayon sa dharma, ay iyong ina; at ang diyos na may tatlong mata ang iyong ama. Pakinggan mo ngayon ang dahilan nito.”
{ "primaryRasa": "adbhuta", "secondaryRasa": "shanta", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
In the Andhaka cycle, Andhaka is connected (by boon, adoption, or lineage traditions across Purāṇas) to Śiva’s sphere; Prahlāda invokes dharmic relationship to show that desiring Pārvatī is tantamount to incest and thus a grave adharma.
It asserts that the relationship is not merely emotional or rhetorical but grounded in the normative order—social, cosmic, and scriptural propriety—thereby making Andhaka’s intent categorically forbidden.
Prahlāda signals an explanatory backstory (kāraṇa) that will justify the stated kinship—typically a narrative of origin/boon/affiliation that binds Andhaka to Śiva’s family and sets up the ethical and karmic basis for the ensuing conflict.