Matsya Purana — Devayānī–Śarmiṣṭhā Dialogue: Yayāti’s Transgression, Shloka 26

Devanagari script

अविब्रुवन्ती किंचिच्च राजानं साश्रुलोचना अचिरादेव सम्प्राप्ता काव्यस्योशनसो ऽन्तिकम् //

Transliteration

avibruvantī kiṃcicca rājānaṃ sāśrulocanā acirādeva samprāptā kāvyasyośanaso 'ntikam //

Translation

Nang hindi nagsasalita ng anuman sa hari, at may mga matang puno ng luha, di naglaon ay lumapit siya sa harapan ni Kāvya Uśanas (Śukrācārya).

Word by Word

• avibruvantī: not speaking, not uttering

• kiṃcit: anything, even a word

• ca: and

• rājānam: to the king

• sāśru-locanā: having tearful eyes, with eyes full of tears

• acirāt eva: very soon, before long

• samprāptā: reached, arrived

• kāvyasya: of Kāvya (Śukra)

• uśanasaḥ: of Uśanas (Śukrācārya)

• antikam: near, in the presence of

Speaker

• Narrator (Purāṇic narrator describing the episode; traditionally Sūta relating the narrative)

Entities Mentioned

• Rājā (the king)
• Kāvya Uśanas (Śukrācārya)

Tags

• Royal narrative
• Śukrācārya
• Counsel
• Dharma
• Emotion in itihāsa-purāṇa

FAQs

What does this verse reveal about the creation or dissolution (Pralaya)?

This verse does not address pralaya directly; it highlights a narrative moment where a distressed person seeks a sage’s proximity for guidance, a common Purāṇic motif independent of cosmological dissolution.

How does this verse relate to the duties of a King or Householder?

It implies the limits of royal authority in personal or moral crises: even in a king’s presence, resolution may require approaching a learned preceptor (ācārya). It supports the dharmic ideal that rulers and householders should honor and consult sages for right counsel.

What is the architectural or ritual significance mentioned here?

No vastu/temple-building or ritual procedure is stated in this verse; the significance is social-dharmic—seeking refuge and instruction at a guru’s side (antika) when emotionally overwhelmed.